In order to PROVE that "substance X" is a dangerous pathogen, that substance must be (a) isolated AND (b) purified. The "and purified" is often left out of the "it has not been isolated" statement.
Both are required, because you must first isolate the substance from the blood sample, and then purify it, meaning to remove all "non-substance X" particles from the sample.
ONLY THEN, can you test to see if it actually is harmful to health (if it is a pathogen), which is done by using lab animals.
If (and ONLY IF) it proves to be pathogenic through lab testing, can you then say FOR SURE that it is a harmful pathogen.
Then, that sample is referred to as the "gold standard." This means you can test anyone's blood sample and compare it to this KNOWN pathogen, and determine if it is a match or not. (Note: If you come across the term "gold standard," read carefully to see if they are using this term in this way, or if they are misusing the term to mean something else -- they do this often, using terminology out-of-context).
Also, you can take a sample of this known pathogen and put it into a vaccine to be used for the purpose of injecting into people, causing a person to have an antigen response, which will (according to vaccine theory) prevent the person from getting the illness in the future if that particular pathogen should ever enter the body.
So ... how do we KNOW that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and purified?
First, you will not find any articles from the CDC or their co-conspirators blatantly admitting that nobody has ever done this. So, you have to use your critical thinking skills.
Second, the fact that they do not claim that they have isolated AND PURIFIED it is a clue. You will find claims that it has been "isolated" but you have to read further. You will find out that "isolated" in the context they use ONLY means it is a blood sample from ONE PERSON. It does NOT mean anything within that blood has been isolated, much less purified to the point that ONLY "substance X" is in that test tube. They lie through omission and by using terminology out-of-context.
Third, the UK version of the CDC said many months ago, and the CDC itself recently admitted, that there is NO KNOWN SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2 for labs to obtain so that it can be studied. How is that possible if it had been isolated AND purified? How is it possible for a vaccine to be made, with a sample of the known pathogen ("substance X") if there is no sample to make the vaccine with? NONE of the 4 "vaccines" have ANY of the sample ... because NO SAMPLE EXISTS.
This article explains how they pulled off the deception:
SARS-CoV-2 ... DOES NOT EXIST. There is no isolated and purified sample because it is not possible to isolate and purify something that does not exist.
They invented a FAKE virus and created a plandemic out of it.
That is not to say that people have not gotten sick or that there might not ALSO be a real lab-made substance out there.
It is quite possible that Fauci and his co-conspirators took a coronavirus and/or influenza virus, manipulated it in an American and/or Chinese lab, and unleashed it on the world, and then lied about the genetic composition so that the world's labs would have false dataset to work with when they misused the PCR for "diagnosis."
In other words, there could be TWO things going on, simultaneously: First, a lab-created/modified version of coronavirus and/or influenza which has been manipulated for gain of function, and has made people sick, but is NOT directly being tested by labs. Second, a FAKE "Covid" genetic sequence (which might also come partially from the lab-created/modified thing) which the labs around the world have been looking at, but which is NOT exactly the same thing as the lab-created thing.
The labs could be looking at PARTS OF the lab-created thing, but also parts of other things, and the "full sequence" they think they are looking at could be entirely made-up by Fauci and the CDC.
Whatever the real story is, though, there is NO SAMPLE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD of an isolated AND purified SARS-CoV-2 virus. We have to start with that end realization, and then work backwards to figure out what has really been going on.
In order to PROVE that "substance X" is a dangerous pathogen, that substance must be (a) isolated AND (b) purified. The "and purified" is often left out of "it has not been isolated."
Both are required, because you must first isolate the substance from the blood sample, and then purify it, meaning to remove all "non-substance X" particles from the sample.
ONLY THEN, can you test to see if it actually is harmful to health (if it is a pathogen), which is done by using lab animals.
If (and ONLY IF) it proves to be pathogenic through lab testing, can you then say FOR SURE that it is a harmful pathogen.
Then, that sample is referred to as the "gold standard." This means you can test anyone's blood sample and compare it to this KNOWN pathogen, and determine if it is a match or not.
Also, you can take a sample of this known pathogen and put it into a vaccine to be used for the purpose of injecting into people, causing a person to have an antigen response, which will (according to vaccine theory) prevent the person from getting the illness in the future if that particular pathogen should ever enter the body.
So ... how do we KNOW that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and purified?
First, you will not find any articles from the CDC or their co-conspirators blatantly admitting that nobody has ever done this. So, you have to use your critical thinking skills.
Second, the fact that they do not claim that they have isolated AND PURIFIED it is a clue. You will find claims that it has been "isolated" but you have to read further. You will find out that "isolated" in the context they use ONLY means it is a blood sample from ONE PERSON. It does NOT mean anything within that blood has been isolated, much less purified to the point that ONLY "substance X" is in that test tube. They lie through omission and by using terminology out-of-context.
Third, the UK version of the CDC said many months ago, and the CDC itself recently admitted, that there is NO KNOWN SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2 for labs to obtain so that it can be studied. How is that possible if it had been isolated AND purified? How is it possible for a vaccine to be made, with a sample of the known pathogen ("substance X") if there is no sample to make the vaccine with? NONE of the 4 "vaccines" have ANY of the sample ... because NO SAMPLE EXISTS.
This article explains how they pulled off the deception:
SARS-CoV-2 ... DOES NOT EXIST. There is no isolated and purified sample because it is not possible to isolate and purify something that does not exist.
They invented a FAKE virus and created a plandemic out of it.
That is not to say that people have not gotten sick or that there might not ALSO be a real lab-made substance out there.
It is quite possible that Fauci and his co-conspirators took a coronavirus and/or influenza virus, manipulated it in an American and/or Chinese lab, and unleashed it on the world, and then lied about the genetic composition so that the world's labs would have false dataset to work with when they misused the PCR for "diagnosis."
In other words, there could be TWO things going on, simultaneously: First, a lab-created/modified version of coronavirus and/or influenza which has been manipulated for gain of function, and has made people sick, but is NOT directly being tested by labs. Second, a FAKE "Covid" genetic sequence (which might also come partially from the lab-created/modified thing) which the labs around the world have been looking at, but which is NOT exactly the same thing as the lab-created thing.
The labs could be looking at PARTS OF the lab-created thing, but also parts of other things, and the "full sequence" they think they are looking at could be entirely made-up by Fauci and the CDC.
Whatever the real story is, though, there is NO SAMPLE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD of an isolated AND purified SARS-CoV-2 virus. We have to start with that end realization, and then work backwards to figure out what has really been going on.
In order to PROVE that "substance X" is a dangerous pathogen, that substance must be (a) isolated AND (b) purified. The "and purified" is often left out of "it has not been isolated."
Both are required, because you must first isolate the substance from the blood sample, and then purify it, meaning to remove all "non-substance X" particles from the sample.
ONLY THEN, can you test to see if it actually is harmful to health (if it is a pathogen), which is done by using lab animals.
If (and ONLY IF) it proves to be pathogenic through lab testing, can you then say FOR SURE that it is a harmful pathogen.
Then, that sample is referred to as the "gold standard." This means you can test anyone's blood sample and compare it to this KNOWN pathogen, and determine if it is a match or not.
Also, you can take a sample of this known pathogen and put it into a vaccine to be used for the purpose of injecting into people, causing a person to have an antigen response, which will (according to vaccine theory) prevent the person from getting the illness in the future if that particular pathogen should ever enter the body.
So ... how do we KNOW that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated and purified?
First, you will not find any articles from the CDC or their co-conspirators blatantly admitting that nobody has ever done this. So, you have to use your critical thinking skills.
Second, the fact that they do not claim that they have isolated AND PURIFIED it is a clue. You will find claims that it has been "isolated" but you have to read further. You will find out that "isolated" in the context they use ONLY means it is a blood sample from ONE PERSON. It does NOT mean anything within that blood has been isolated, much less purified to the point that ONLY "substance X" is in that test tube. They lie through omission and by using terminology out-of-context.
Third, the UK version of the CDC said many months ago, and the CDC itself recently admitted, that there is NO KNOWN SAMPLE OF SARS-CoV-2 for labs to obtain so that it can be studied. How is that possible if it had been isolated AND purified? How is it possible for a vaccine to be made, with a sample of the known pathogen ("substance X") if there is no sample to make the vaccine with? NONE of the 4 "vaccines" have ANY of the sample ... because NO SAMPLE EXISTS.
This article explains how they pulled off the deception:
SARS-CoV-2 ... DOES NOT EXIST. There is no isolated and purified sample because it is not possible to isolate and purify something that does not exist.
They invented a FAKE virus and created a plandemic out of it.
That is not to say that people have not gotten sick or that there might not ALSO be a real lab-made substance out there.
It is quite possible that Fauci and his co-conspirators took a coronavirus and/or influenza virus, manipulated it in an American and/or Chinese lab, and unleashed it on the world, and then lied about the genetic composition so that the world's labs would have false dataset to work with when they misused the PCR for "diagnosis."
In other words, there could be TWO things going on, simultaneously: First, a lab-created/modified version of coronavirus and/or influenza which has been manipulated for gain of function, and has made people sick, but is NOT directly being tested by labs. Second, a FAKE "Covid" genetic sequence (which might also come partiall from the lab-created/modified thing) which the labs around the world have been looking at, but which is NOT exactly the same thing as the lab-created thing.
The labs could be looking at PARTS OF the lab-created thing, but also parts of other things, and the "full sequence" they think they are looking at could be entirely made-up by Fauci and the CDC.
Whatever the real story is, though, there is NO SAMPLE ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD of an isolated AND purified SARS-CoV-2 virus. We have to start with that end realization, and then work backwards to figure out what has really been going on.