From what I know now, you're missing one big piece of the puzzle here, which actually simplifies this theory of the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide works.

There is no such thing as a "virus". No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

What Virologists call "isolation", is the process of growing a contaminated cell culture, damaging it, and then viewing the dead cell debris under an electron microscope, which they then consider "the isolated virus", even though nothing was ever isolated by the process.

The debris is indistinguishable from known exosomes (necrotic cellular detritus), which are present without any virus, and observed by scientists in other biology fields.

The biochemical make up of the "isolated" particles is never analyzed by Virologists.

There is never any control included, because the only times a sterilized control has been used in a study, it resulted in identical exosomes being observed without ever being contaminated with a virus. This was first proven by the inventor of this method of "isolation" himself.

The only times that animal tests are done, no control is included, even though a control would be the only way to rule out the environment and handling of the animals being the cause of the observed outcomes.

If you take this into account, you can see how the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide treats disease (which is falsely attributed to a "virus"), is actually identical to how you describe it working for arthritis. Disease caused by toxins results in cell damage, and the Chlorine Dioxide helps break down the dead tissue so it can be eliminated from your body.

From what I know now, you're missing one big piece of the puzzle here, which actually simplifies this theory of the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide works.

There is no such thing as a "virus". No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

What Virologists call "isolation", is the process of growing a contaminated cell culture, damaging it, and then viewing the dead cell debris under an electron microscope, which they then consider "the isolated virus", even though nothing was ever isolated by the process.

The debris is indistinguishable from known exosomes (necrotic cellular detritus), which are present without any virus, and observed by scientists in other biology fields.

The biochemical make up of the "isolated" particles is never analyzed by Virologists.

There is never any control included, because the only times a sterilized control has been used in a study, it resulted in identical exosomes being observed without ever being contaminated with a virus. This was first proven by the inventor of this method of "isolation" himself.

The only times that animal tests are done, no control is included, even though a control would be the only way to rule out the environment and handling of the animals being the cause of the observed outcomes.

If you take this into account, you can see how the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide treats disease (which is falsely attributed to a "virus"), is actually identical to how you describe it working for arthritis. Disease caused by toxins results in cell damage, and the Chlorine Dioxide helps break down the dead tissue to it can be eliminated from your body.

From what I know now, you're missing one big piece of the puzzle here, which actually simplifies this theory of the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide works.

There is no such thing as a "virus". No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

What Virologists call "isolation", is the process of growing a contaminated cell culture, damaging it, and then viewing the dead cell debris under an electron microscope, which they then consider "the isolated virus", even though nothing was ever isolated by the process.

The debris is indistinguishable from known exosomes (necrotic cellular detritus), which are present without any virus, and observed by scientists in other biology fields.

The biochemical make up of the "isolated" particles is never analyzed by Virologists.

There is never any control included, because the only times a sterilized control has been used in a study, it resulted in identical exosomes being observed without ever being contaminated with a virus. This was first proven by the inventor of this method of "isolation" himself.

The only times that animal tests are done, no control is included, even though a control would be the only way to rule out the environment and handling of the animals being the cause of the observed outcomes.

If you take this into account, you can see how the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide treats disease (which is falsely attributed to a "virus"), is actually identical to how you describe it working for arthritis. Disease caused by toxins results in cell damage, and the Chlorine Dioxide helps break down the dead tissue to it can be eliminated from your body.

From what I know now, you're missing one big piece of the puzzle here, which actually simplifies this theory of the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide works.

There is no such thing as a "virus". No virus has ever been isolated in the history of Virology.

What Virologists call "isolation", is the process of growing a contaminated cell culture, damaging it, and then viewing the dead cell debris under an electron microscope, which they then consider "the isolated virus", even though nothing was ever isolated by the process.

The debris is indistinguishable from known exosomes (necrotic cellular detritus), which are present without any virus, and observed by scientists in other biology fields.

The biochemical make up of the "isolated" particles is never analyzed by Virologists.

There is never any control included, because the only times a sterilized control has been used in a study, it resulted in identical exosomes being observed without ever being contaminated with a virus. This was first proven by the inventor of this method of "isolation" himself.

The only times that animal tests are done, no control is included, even though a control would be the only way to rule out the environment and handling of the animals being the cause of the observed outcomes.

If you take this into account, you can see how the mechanism by which Chlorine Dioxide treats disease (which is falsely attributed to a "virus"), is actually identical to how you describe it working for arthritis. Disease caused by toxins results in cell damage, and the the Chlorine Dioxide helps break down the dead tissue to it can be eliminated from your body.