Tell them to read the actual Pfizer experiment data for themselves. Don't take anyone's word for it. Don't take anyone's interpretation of it. READ it for themselves.

I wrote about it and referenced it here:

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/

After they read it, ask them why they think that ... (a) an experimental drug (not legally classified as a "vaccine") that (b) resulted in more people dying in the test group than the control group and (c) resulted in more adverse complications in the test group than the control group and (d) produced less than a 1% difference in getting a symptom (statistically insignificant) of what might (or might not) be related to Covid and (e) never even looked at whether or not the drug would prevent the spread of Covid ... is worth taking?

Is a 3-month trial, with conclusions determined after just 7 DAYS (that later were found to be incorrect or incomplete conclusions), a long enough time frame to determine if something is safe or effective?

Look up the info on the lab animals that died from the drugs.

Look up the recent announcement by CDC and FDA that the PCR test is not valid (which we have been saying around here for over a year).

Look up the info that says that the Delta Variant is NOT BEING TESTED AT ALL. There is NO TEST for it. So, how can anyone conclude that it is the cause of anything?

Look up the info that shows that hospitals are no longer TESTING people who say they are vaccinated, unless it is absolutely necessary, but they ARE testing people who say they are not vaccinated. Doesn't that explain the 94% claim?

There is a lot of ammo out there. Most people refuse to look at it.

When they say "but but but ... muh gubmint and media would never lie to me" ... ask them about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Secretary of Defense McNamara later admitted that it never happened, and was just a pretext to trick Americans into supporting war in Vietnam. The media did NOT discover this truth. Why not?

Tell them to read the actual Pfizer experiment data for themselves. Don't take anyone's word for it. Don't take anyone's interpretation of it. READ it for themselves.

I wrote about it and referenced it here:

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/

After they read it, ask them why they think that ... (a) an experimental drug (not legally classified as a "vaccine") that (b) resulted in more people dying in the test group than the control group and (c) resulted in more adverse complications in the test group than the control group and (d) produced less than a 1% difference in getting a symptom (statistically insignificant) of what might (or might not) be related to Covid and (e) never even looked at whether or not the drug would prevent the spread of Covid ... is worth taking?

Is a 3-month trial (with conclusions determined after just 7 DAYS, that later were found to be incorrect or incomplete conclusions) a long enough time frame to determine if something is safe or effective?

Look up the info on the lab animals that died from the drugs.

Look up the recent announcement by CDC and FDA that the PCR test is not valid (which we have been saying around here for over a year).

Look up the info that says that the Delta Variant is NOT BEING TESTED AT ALL. There is NO TEST for it. So, how can anyone conclude that it is the cause of anything?

Look up the info that shows that hospitals are no longer TESTING people who say they are vaccinated, unless it is absolutely necessary, but they ARE testing people who say they are not vaccinated. Doesn't that explain the 94% claim?

There is a lot of ammo out there. Most people refuse to look at it.

When they say "but but but ... muh gubmint and media would never lie to me" ... ask them about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Secretary of Defense McNamara later admitted that it never happened, and was just a pretext to trick Americans into supporting war in Vietnam. The media did NOT discover this truth. Why not?

Tell them to read the actual Pfizer experiment data for themselves. Don't take anyone's word for it. Don't take anyone's interpretation of it. READ it for themselves.

I wrote about it and referenced it here:

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/

After they read it, ask them why they think that ... (a) an experimental drug (not legally classified as a "vaccine") that (b) resulted in more people dying in the test group than the control group and (c) resulted in more adverse complications in the test group than the control group and (d) produced less than a 1% difference in getting a symptom (statistically insignificant) of what might (or might not) be related to Covid and (e) never even looked at whether or not the drug would prevent the spread of Covid ... is worth taking?

Is a 3-month trial (with conclusions determined after just 7 DAYS, that later were found to be incorrect or incomplete conclusions) a long enough time frame to determine if something is safe or effective?

Look up the info on the lab animals that died from the drugs.

Look up the recent announcement by CDC and FDA that the PCR test is not valid (which we have been saying around here for over a year).

Look up the info that says that the Delta Variant is NOT BEING TESTED AT ALL. There is NO TEST for it. So, how can anyone conclude that it is the cause of anything?

Look up the info that shows that hospitals are no longer TESTING people who say they are vaccinated, unless it is absolutely necessary, but they ARE testing people who say they are not vaccinated. Doesn't that explain the 94% claim?

There is a lot of ammo out there. Most people refuse to look at it.

When they say "but but but ... muh gubmint and media would never lie to me" ... ask them about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Secretary of State McNamara later admitted that it never happened, and was just a pretext to trick Americans into supporting war in Vietnam. The media did NOT discover this truth. Why not?

Tell them to read the actual Pfizer experiment data for themselves. Don't take anyone's word for it. Don't take anyone's interpretation of it. READ it for themselves.

I wrote about it and referenced it here:

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/

After they read it, ask them why they think that ... (a) an experimental drug (not legally classified as a "vaccine") that (b) resulted in more people dying in the test group than the control group and (c) resulted in more adverse complications in the test group than the control group and (d) produced less than a 1% difference in getting a symptom (statistically insignificant) of what might (or might not) be related to Covid and (e) never even looked at whether or not the drug would prevent the spread of Covid ... is worth taking?

Is a 3-month trial (with conclusions determined after just 7 DAYS, that later were found to be incorrect or incomplete conclusions) a long enough time frame to determine if something is safe or effective?

Look up the info on the lab animals that died from the drugs.

Look up the recent announcement by CDC and FDA that the PCR test is not valid (which we have been saying around here for over a year).

Look up the info that says that the Delta Variant is NOT BEING TESTED AT ALL. There is NO TEST for it. So, how can anyone conclude that it is the cause of anything?

Look up the info that shows that hospitals are no longer TESTING people who say they are vaccinated, unless it is absolutely necessary, but they ARE testing people who say they are not vaccinated. Doesn't explain the 94% claim?

There is a lot of ammo out there. Most people refuse to look at it.

When they say "but but but ... muh gubmint and media would never lie to me" ... ask them about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Secretary of State McNamara later admitted that it never happened, and was just a pretext to trick Americans into supporting war in Vietnam. The media did NOT discover this truth. Why not?

Tell them to read the actual Pfizer experiment data for themselves. Don't take anyone's word for it. Don't take anyone's interpretation of it. READ it for themselves.

I wrote about it and referenced it here:

https://greatawakening.win/p/12jcvZXRBO/more-info-on-the-actual-pfizer-v/c/

After they read it, ask them why they think that ... (a) an experimental drug (not legally classified as a "vaccine") that (b) resulted in more people dying in the test group than the control group and (c) resulted in more adverse complications in the test group than the control group and (d) produced less than a 1% difference in getting a symptom (statistically insignificant) of what might (or might not) be related to Covid and (e) never even looked at whether or not the drug would prevent the spread of Covid ... is worth taking?

Is a 3-month trial (with conclusions determined after just 7 DAYS, that later were found to be incorrect or incomplete conclusions) a long enough time frame to determine if something is safe or effective.

Look up the info on the lab animals that died from the drugs.

Look up the recent announcement by CDC and FDA that the PCR test is not valid (which we have been saying around here for over a year).

Look up the info that says that the Delta Variant is NOT BEING TESTED AT ALL. There is NO TEST for it. So, how can anyone conclude that it is the cause of anything?

Look up the info that shows that hospitals are no longer TESTING people who say they are vaccinated, unless it is absolutely necessary, but they ARE testing people who say they are not vaccinated, and ask them if that doesn't explain the 94% claim.

There is a lot of ammo out there. Most people refuse to look at it.

When they say "but but but ... muh gubmint and media would never lie to me" ... ask them about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. Secretary of State McNamara later admitted that it never happened, and was just a pretext to trick Americans into supporting war in Vietnam. The media did NOT discover this truth. Why not?