Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: source

Ex parte Milligan (1866) concerned the rights of an Indiana man accused of conspiring against the Union during the Civil War. The Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for civilians to be tried by military tribunals when civil courts are available.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-fact-check-ex-parte-milligan-idUSKBN22Q2M6

Ex parte Milligan seems to relate to the Great Awakening in regards to the circumstances required for military tribunals, but the text presented in this post is not in the text of that case.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Ex parte Milligan (1866) concerned the rights of an Indiana man accused of conspiring against the Union during the Civil War. The Supreme Court ruled that it is unconstitutional for civilians to be tried by military tribunals when civil courts are available.

Ex parte Milligan seems to relate to the Great Awakening in regards to the circumstances required for military tribunals, but the text presented in this post is not in the text of that case.

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/

3 years ago
1 score