Just 2 months ago ... announced that same weekend that they were having a baby ... Here we are 2 months later and it's gone.
Sorry to hear that, and I don't know how appropriate it is to bring this up (to them), but it seems like the mother had the vaxx early on. Was it during the 1st trimester or before insemination?
Here is a vaxx study (from the New England Journal of Medicine -- considered by many doctors to be the #1 most authoritative medical journal in the world, though I have my doubts) that discloses a lot of numbers, but apparently seems to hide important data by the way the report is written (this is very common with Big Pharma):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Here is a story explaining what the numbers mean (it's from Mike Adams, and some will dismiss him, but a search engine will show others reporting this, too):
I think Adams' math is correct (or at least very close -- much of the report appears to be written to purposely obfuscate). But read for yourself (both websites) and decide for yourself.
This is very important for people to know, if the math is correct.
Bottom line:
827 women were pregnant and got the vaxx. Of those, 712 had live births and 115 had a dead baby. Of the 115, there were 104 "spontaneous abortions" which is a euphamism for miscarriage, 1 was a stillborn, and the other 10 were an abortion or something else accidental (the paper is vague on these 10).
Of the 104 miscarriages, 96 occurred in the first trimester. This is important because it means the woman had the vaxx either before pregnancy or during the first trimester.
Of the 712 successful live births, 700 of them were to women who had the vaxx in the third trimester.
So, only 12 live births were to women who had the vaxx in the first or second trimester or before pregnancy, while 96 miscarriages were to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy (because the miscarriage occured during the first trimester).
This is a massive percentage (over 80%) of miscarriages to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy. The numbers are obscured by way the report is written, but these numbers seem pretty clear.
Everybody needs to know this.
P.S. What does third trimester mean? It means more than 6 months. Why is that potentially significant? Because we are hearing stories that the vaxx "wears off" after 4-6 months, which is why they are crying for boosters. There is likely something to this.
Just 2 months ago ... announced that same weekend that they were having a baby ... Here we are 2 months later and it's gone.
Sorry to hear that, and I don't know how appropriate it is to bring this up (to them), but it seems like the mother had the vaxx early on. Was it during the 1st trimester or before insemination?
Here is a vaxx study (from the New England Journal of Medicine -- considered by many doctors to be the #1 most authoritative medical journal in the world, though I have my doubts) that discloses a lot of numbers, but apparently seems to hide important data by the way the report is written (this is very common with Big Pharma):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Here is a story explaining what the numbers mean (it's from Mike Adams, and some will dismiss him, but a search engine will show others reporting this, too):
I think Adams' math is correct (or at least very close -- much of the report appears to be written to purposely obfuscate). But read for yourself (both websites) and decide for yourself.
This is very important for people to know, if the math is correct.
Bottom line:
827 women were pregnant and got the vaxx. Of those, 712 had live births and 115 had a dead baby. Of the 115, there were 104 "spontaneous abortions" which is a euphamism for miscarriage, 1 was a stillborn, and the other 10 were an abortion or something else accidental (the paper is vague on these 10).
Of the 104 miscarriages, 96 occurred in the first trimester. This is important because it means the woman had the vaxx either before pregnancy or during the first trimester.
Of the 712 successful live births, 700 of them were to women who had the vaxx in the third trimester.
So, only 12 live births were to women who had the vaxx in the first or second trimester or before pregnancy, while 96 miscarriages were to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy (because the miscarriage occured during the first trimester).
This is a massive percentage (over 80%) of miscarriages to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy. The numbers are obscured by way the report is written, but these numbers seem pretty clear.
Everybody needs to know this.
P.S. What does third trimester mean? It means more than 6 months. Why is that potentially significant? Because we are hearing stories that the vaxx "wears off" after 4-6 months, which is why they are crying for boosters. There is likely something to this.
Just 2 months ago ... announced that same weekend that they were having a baby ... Here we are 2 months later and it's gone.
Sorry to hear that, and I don't know how appropriate it is to bring this up (to them), but it seems like the mother had the vaxx early on. Was it during the 1st trimester or before insemination?
Here is a vaxx study (from the New England Journal of Medicine -- considered by many doctors to be the #1 most authoritative medical journal in the world, though I have my doubts) that discloses a lot of numbers, but apparently seems to hide important data by the way the report is written (this is very common with Big Pharma):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Here is a story explaining what the numbers mean (it's from Mike Adams, and some will dismiss him, but a search engine will show others reporting this, too):
I think Adams' math is correct. But read for yourself (both websites) and decide for yourself.
This is very important for people to know, if the math is correct.
Bottom line:
827 women were pregnant and got the vaxx. Of those, 712 had live births and 115 had a dead baby. Of the 115, there were 104 "spontaneous abortions" which is a euphamism for miscarriage, 1 was a stillborn, and the other 10 were an abortion or something else accidental (the paper is vague on these 10).
Of the 104 miscarriages, 96 occurred in the first trimester. This is important because it means the woman had the vaxx either before pregnancy or during the first trimester.
Of the 712 successful live births, 700 of them were to women who had the vaxx in the third trimester.
So, only 12 live births were to women who had the vaxx in the first or second trimester or before pregnancy, while 96 miscarriages were to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy (because the miscarriage occured during the first trimester).
This is a massive percentage (over 80%) of miscarriages to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy. The numbers are obscured by way the report is written, but these numbers seem pretty clear.
Everybody needs to know this.
P.S. What does third trimester mean? It means more than 6 months. Why is that potentially significant? Because we are hearing stories that the vaxx "wears off" after 4-6 months, which is why they are crying for boosters. There is likely something to this.
Just 2 months ago ... announced that same weekend that they were having a baby ... Here we are 2 months later and it's gone.
Sorry to hear that, and I don't know how appropriate it is to bring this up (to them), but it seems like the mother had the vaxx early on. Was it during the 1st trimester or before insemination?
Here is a vaxx study that discloses a lot of numbers, but apparently seems to hide important data by the way the report is written (this is very common with Big Pharma):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Here is a story explaining what the numbers mean (it's from Mike Adams, and some will dismiss him, but a search engine will show others reporting this, too):
I think Adams' math is correct. But read for yourself (both websites) and decide for yourself.
This is very important for people to know, if the math is correct.
Bottom line:
827 women were pregnant and got the vaxx. Of those, 712 had live births and 115 had a dead baby. Of the 115, there were 104 "spontaneous abortions" which is a euphamism for miscarriage, 1 was a stillborn, and the other 10 were an abortion or something else accidental (the paper is vague on these 10).
Of the 104 miscarriages, 96 occurred in the first trimester. This is important because it means the woman had the vaxx either before pregnancy or during the first trimester.
Of the 712 successful live births, 700 of them were to women who had the vaxx in the third trimester.
So, only 12 live births were to women who had the vaxx in the first or second trimester or before pregnancy, while 96 miscarriages were to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy (because the miscarriage occured during the first trimester).
This is a massive percentage (over 80%) of miscarriages to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy. The numbers are obscured by way the report is written, but these numbers seem pretty clear.
Everybody needs to know this.
P.S. What does third trimester mean? It means more than 6 months. Why is that potentially significant? Because we are hearing stories that the vaxx "wears off" after 4-6 months, which is why they are crying for boosters. There is likely something to this.
Just 2 months ago ... announced that same weekend that they were having a baby ... Here we are 2 months later and it's gone.
Sorry to hear that, and I don't know how appropriate it is to bring this up (to them), but it seems like the mother had the vaxx early on. Was it during the 1st trimester or before insemination?
Here is a vaxx study that discloses a lot of numbers, but apparently seems to hide important data by the way the report is written (this is very common with Big Pharma):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Here is a story explaining what the numbers mean (it's from Mike Adams, and some will dismiss him, but a search engine will show others reporting this, too):
I think Adams' math is correct. But read for yourself (both websites) and decide for yourself.
This is very important for people to know, if the math is correct.
Bottom line:
827 women were pregnant and got the vaxx. Of those, 712 had live births and 115 had a dead baby. Of the 115, there were 104 "spontaneous abortions" which is a euphamism for miscarriage, 1 was a stillborn, and the other 10 were an abortion or something else accidental (the paper is vague on these 10).
Of the 104 miscarriages, 96 occurred in the first trimester. This is important because it means the woman had the vaxx either before pregnancy or during the first trimester.
Of the 712 successful live births, 700 of them were to women who had the vaxx in the third trimester.
So, only 12 live births were to women who had the vaxx in the first or second trimester or before pregnancy, while 96 miscarriages were to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy (because the miscarriage occured during the first trimester).
This is a massive percentage (over 80%) of miscarriages to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy. The numbers are obscured by way the report is written, but these numbers seem pretty clear.
Everybody needs to know this.
Just 2 months ago ... announced that same weekend that they were having a baby ... Here we are 2 months later and it's gone.
Sorry to hear that, and I don't know how appropriate it is to bring this up (to them), but it seems like the mother had the vaxx early on. Was it during the 1st trimester or before insemination?
Here is a vaxx study that discloses a lot of numbers, but apparently seems to hide important data by the way the report is written (this is very common with Big Pharma):
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
Here is a story explaining what the numbers mean (it's from Mike Adams, and some will dismiss him, but a search engine will show others reporting this, too):
I think Adams' math is correct. But read for yourself (both websites) and decide for yourself.
This is very important for people to know, if the math is correct.
Bottom line:
827 women were pregnant and got the vaxx. Of those, 712 had live births and 115 had a dead baby. Of the 115, there were 104 "spontaneous abortions" which is a euphamism for miscarriage, 1 was a stillborn, and the other 10 were an abortion or something else accidental (the paper is vague on these 10).
Of the 104 miscarriages, 96 occurred in the first trimester. This is important because it means the woman had the vaxx either before pregnancy or during the first trimester.
Of the 712 successful live births, 700 of them were to women who had the vaxx in the third trimester.
So, only 12 live births were to women who had the vaxx in the first or second trimester or before pregnancy, while 96 miscarriages were to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy (because the miscarriage occured during the first trimester).
This is a massive percentage (over 80%) of miscarriages to women who had the vaxx in the first trimester or prior to pregnancy. The numbers are obscured by way the report is written, but these numbers seem pretty clear.
Everybody need to know this.