Thanks for the link. Personally I was indifferent on the validity of your assertion, I was just defending the right to ask for proof on an assertion made. You didn't say something like "sorry, I don't have time to find it, but you can search for xyx on bitchute and that might help". You defended not giving proof to an assertion. People are looking for truth, so if you have something you want to share and can't back it up if people are interested in it, then people need to decide if they trust you enough to take it at your word. You mentioned q doing stuff like that, well he/they established a track record enough to take what was said as something important to stand on its own. That's hard to do on the internet. It took q years to do that, in many cases, and still a lot of people (most, worldwide) doubt it means anything. I consider myself q-curious as a td migrant so thanks for the link and I'll check it out.

Thanks for the link. Personally I was indifferent on the validity of your assertion, I was just defending the right to ask for proof on an assertion made. You didn't say something like "sorry, I don't have time to find it, but you can search for xyx on bitchute and that might help". You defended not giving proof to an assertion. People are looking for truth, so if you have something you want to share and can't back it up if people are interested in it, then people need to decide if they trust you enough to take it at your word. You mentioned q doing stuff like that, well he/they established a track record enough to take what was said as something important to stand on its own. That's hard to do on the internet. It took q years to do that, in many cases, and still a lot of people (most, worldwide) doubt it means anything. I consider myself q-curious so thanks for the link and I'll check it out.