The easiest answer to this question is provided by VAERS itself: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.
So a 98 year old with liver cancer dies a week after the vaccine? Reported to VAERS.
Chronic smoker dies of pneumonia a month after the shot? VAERS.
You get the shot and then the next day you have the sniffles? That’s a legitimate reason to submit to VAERS.
Basically, if the vaccine can’t immediately be ruled out and it was given recently, the death is reported to VAERS.
But wouldn’t at least some of the deaths be guaranteed to be from the vaccine anyway, even if it’s being flooded with deaths that probably aren’t from the vaccine?
Well, no. Again, from VAERS:
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
So VAERS accepts literally all reports without verification, and requires all deaths and illnesses that pop up soon after the vaccine to be reported by practitioners.
So how is that useful?
For you, it’s not. At all. But for medical researchers, it allows them to see what strange cases might need to be verified, and to focus on on localized spikes in the data to investigate specific batches.
This data is available to you, but it’s not curated for your use. It is impossible to tell how many deaths, if any, were caused by the vaccine using VAERS data.
The vaccine could literally be 100% saline and still show exactly the same data we’re looking at now. Nothing is verified and a lot of garbage data gets reported because it’s required to be. Because this data isn’t designed to see whether the vaccine is killing people. It’s designed to identify spikes where bad batches of the vaccine might be or to indicate trends over time.
I would highly recommend reading the VAERS guide to understanding its data. It’s all there.
The easiest answer to this question is provided by VAERS itself: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.
So a 98 year old with liver cancer dies a week after the vaccine? Reported to VAERS.
Chronic smoker dies of pneumonia a month after the shot? VAERS.
You get the shot and then the next day you have the sniffles? That’s a legitimate reason to submit to VAERS.
Basically, if the vaccine can’t immediately be ruled out and it was given recently, the death is reported to VAERS.
But wouldn’t at least some of the deaths be guaranteed to be from the vaccine anyway, even if it’s being flooded with deaths that probably aren’t from the vaccine?
Well, no. Again, from VAERS:
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
So VAERS accepts literally all reports without verification, and requires all deaths and illnesses that pop up soon after the vaccine to be reported by practitioners.
How is that useful?
For you, it’s not. At all. But for researchers, it allows them to see what needs to be verified, and to focus on on localized spikes in the data to investigate specific batches.
This data is available to you, but it’s not curated for your use. It is impossible to tell how many deaths, if any, were caused by the vaccine using VAERS data.
The vaccine could literally be 100% saline and still show exactly the same data we’re looking at now. Nothing is verified and a lot of garbage data gets reported because it’s required to be. Because this data isn’t designed to see whether the vaccine is killing people. It’s designed to identify spikes where bad batches of the vaccine might be or to indicate trends over time.
I would highly recommend reading the VAERS guide to understanding its data. It’s all there.
The easiest answer to this question is provided by VAERS itself: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.
So a 98 year old with liver cancer dies a week after the vaccine? Reported to VAERS.
Chronic smoker dies of pneumonia a month after the shot? VAERS.
You get the shot and then the next day you have the sniffles? That’s a legitimate reason to submit to VAERS.
Basically, if the vaccine can’t immediately be ruled out and it was given recently, the death or illness is reported to VAERS.
But wouldn’t at least some of the deaths be guaranteed to be from the vaccine anyway, even if it’s being flooded with deaths and problems that probably aren’t from the vaccine?
Well, no. Again, from VAERS:
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
So VAERS accepts literally all reports without verification, and requires all deaths and illnesses that pop up soon after the vaccine to be reported.
How is that useful?
For you, it’s not. At all. But for researchers, it allows them to see what needs to be verified, and to focus on on localized spikes in the data to investigate specific batches.
This data is available to you, but it’s not curated for your use. It is impossible to tell how many deaths, if any, were caused by the vaccine using VAERS data.
The vaccine could literally be 100% saline and still show exactly the same data we’re looking at now. Nothing is verified and a lot of garbage data gets reported because it’s required to be. Because this data isn’t designed to see whether the vaccine is killing people. It’s designed to identify spikes where bad batches of the vaccine might be or to indicate trends over time.
I would highly recommend reading the VAERS guide to understanding its data. It’s all there.
The easiest answer to this question is provided by VAERS itself: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.
So a 98 year old with liver cancer dies a week after the vaccine? Reported to VAERS.
Chronic smoker dies of pneumonia a month after the shot? VAERS.
You get the shot and then the next day you have the sniffles? That’s a legitimate reason to submit to VAERS.
Basically, if the vaccine can’t immediately be ruled out and it was given recently, the death is reported to VAERS.
But wouldn’t at least some of the deaths be guaranteed to be from the vaccine anyway, even if it’s being flooded with deaths that probably aren’t from the vaccine?
Well, no. Again, from VAERS:
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
So VAERS accepts literally all reports without verification, and requires all deaths and illnesses that pop up soon after the vaccine to be reported.
How is that useful?
For you, it’s not. At all. But for researchers, it allows them to see what needs to be verified, and to focus on on localized spikes in the data to investigate specific batches.
This data is available to you, but it’s not curated for your use. It is impossible to tell how many deaths, if any, were caused by the vaccine using VAERS data.
The vaccine could literally be 100% saline and still show exactly the same data we’re looking at now. Nothing is verified and a lot of garbage data gets reported because it’s required to be. Because this data isn’t designed to see whether the vaccine is killing people. It’s designed to identify spikes where bad batches of the vaccine might be or to indicate trends over time.
I would highly recommend reading the VAERS guide to understanding its data. It’s all there.
The easiest answer to this question is provided by VAERS itself: https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html
Therefore, vaccine providers are encouraged to report all adverse events following vaccination, whether or not they believe the vaccination was the cause.
So a 98 year old with liver cancer dies a week after the vaccine? Reported to VAERS.
Chronic smoker dies of pneumonia a month after the shot? VAERS.
Basically, if the vaccine can’t immediately be ruled out and it was given recently, the death is reported to VAERS.
But wouldn’t at least some of the deaths be guaranteed to be from the vaccine anyway, even if it’s being flooded with deaths that probably aren’t from the vaccine?
Well, no. Again, from VAERS:
A report to VAERS generally does not prove that the identified vaccine(s) caused the adverse event described. It only confirms that the reported event occurred sometime after vaccine was given. No proof that the event was caused by the vaccine is required in order for VAERS to accept the report. VAERS accepts all reports without judging whether the event was caused by the vaccine.
So VAERS accepts literally all reports without verification, and requires all deaths and illnesses that pop up soon after the vaccine to be reported.
How is that useful?
For you, it’s not. At all. But for researchers, it allows them to see what needs to be verified, and to focus on on localized spikes in the data to investigate specific batches.
This data is available to you, but it’s not curated for your use. It is impossible to tell how many deaths, if any, were caused by the vaccine using VAERS data.
The vaccine could literally be 100% saline and still show exactly the same data we’re looking at now. Nothing is verified and a lot of garbage data gets reported because it’s required to be. Because this data isn’t designed to see whether the vaccine is killing people. It’s designed to identify spikes where bad batches of the vaccine might be or to indicate trends over time.
I would highly recommend reading the VAERS guide to understanding its data. It’s all there.