"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."

"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."

Used on us? Like, on our minds? On our bodies? What did you mean? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?

"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."

You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.

Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this and any and all AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.

No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.

But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.

It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions, and then make self-contradicting statements as if you've forgotten your original argument completely.

We don't tolerate bullshit here. I'll continue to be harsh on you as long as you are unreasonable.

"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."

"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."

Used on us? Like, on our minds? On our bodies? What did you mean? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?

"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."

You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.

Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this and any and all AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.

No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.

But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.

It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions.

We don't tolerate bullshit here. I'll continue to treat you harshly as long as you are unreasonable.

"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."

"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."

Used on us? Like, one our minds? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?

"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."

You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.

Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this and any and all AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.

No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.

But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.

It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions, and then make self-contradicting statements as if you've forgotten your original argument completely.

We don't tolerate bullshit here. I'll continue to be harsh on you as long as you are unreasonable.

"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."

"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."

Used on us? Like, on our minds? On our bodies? What did you mean? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?

"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."

You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.

Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this and any and all AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.

No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.

But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.

It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions.

"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."

"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."

Used on us? Like, one our minds? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?

"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."

You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.

Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this and any and all AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.

No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.

But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.

It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions.

"AI could well be responsible for the intricacies of the Qniverse."

"Who knows what AI is truly capable of. Who knows how it is already being used upon us for Psy Op purposes."

Used on us? Like, one our minds? How does that happen without learning anything about us or our minds?

"If it is able to do that within the confines of the chess world then you have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess."

You are right, you really aren't saying much at all. You infer it strongly.

Everything you are suggesting completely ignores the fact that this AI can only operate within finite variables and knowable outcomes.

No, I don't "have to recognise the awesome potential beyond chess" unless you strictly meant problems with finite variable and knowable outcomes like games or puzzles.

But I know you didn't mean that because you think it could be responsible for "the intricacies of the Qniverse" whatever that is supposed to mean, which clearly shows you don't understand the AI's limitations.

It's easy to tell when someone's not from around here because they are incapable of comprehending any argument made and will just continue spouting off points based on already disproved notions.