Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

In any medical experiment you have to consider the possibility that the treatment could be worse than the illness or at the very least it could be ineffective.

In any medical experiment, you MUST have a control group which receives the placebo treatment. If you don’t have a proper control group that receives a placebo, then you’re not running a valid medical experiment.

We’re not talking about a desperate situation where the worst virus in history is killing 90% of children. We’re talking about a virus with a known death rate of less than 1% killing vulnerable elderly or people who were already sick with illnesses like cancer or lung disease. These are people were who were already vulnerable to common illnesses like the colds, the flu or pneumonia.

Therefore, rather than throwing desperate treatments at everyone, you would want to run valid medical experiments in order to assess the risk of those new treatments.

If this was truly a desperate situation the government would have pushed the usage of various other treatments like sunlight, vitamin supplementation, HCQ or Ivermectin.

If no one received the vaccine placebos or a non-random group received the vaccine placebo treatments, we will never learn whether the vaccine treatments were effective or not.

If pharmaceutical companies are allowed to hide their raw experimental data, we will never know if the vaccine treatments were effective or not.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

In any medical experiment you have to consider the possibility that the treatment could be worse than the illness or at the very least it could be ineffective.

In any medical experiment, you MUST have a control group which receives the placebo treatment. If you don’t have a proper control group that receives a placebo, then you’re not running a valid medical experiment.

We’re not talking about a desperate situation where the worst virus in history was killing 90% of children. We’re talking about a virus with a known death rate of less than 1% killing vulnerable elderly or already sick people who were already vulnerable to common illnesses like the flu or pneumonia.

Therefore, rather than throwing desperate treatments at everyone, you would want to run valid medical experiments in order to assess the risk of those treatments.

If this was truly a desperate situation the government would have pushed the usage of various other treatments like vitamin supplementation, HCQ or Ivermectin.

If no one received the vaccine placebos or a non-random group received the vaccine placebo treatments, we will never learn whether the vaccine treatments were effective or not.

If pharmaceutical companies are allowed to hide their raw experimental data, we will never know if the vaccine treatments are effective or not.

3 years ago
1 score