Here's the twist. Shiva is in on it, too.
Here is a link to his presentation at the Cyber Symposium:
09:15 "I had to learn case law. I filed my own law suit. On October 30 we had a
...........hearing in Federal Court."
13:02 "On February 1st, once again I shared those 4 emails, screenshots,
...........once again exposing the state election supervisor of Massachusettes,
...........and within 17 minutes I'm deplatformed."
25:15 "Our lawsuit had evolved from October 30th."
26:20 "Twitter filed a false statement. Because she has to show that Twitter did
...........it on their own. You follow what I'm saying, that the government wasn't
...........involved. So she files an affidavit saying 'On February 1st, when we
...........deplatformed Dr. Shiva, we saw his tweet, we had our internal review
...........on February 2nd, on February 3rd we knocked him off after a 3 days
...........of review.' It was total bullshit because I was deplatformed on 17
...........minutes at 9:48 PM on February 1st."
Pull on Q drop 3823 with Time Zone set for ZULU time
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%233823
3823 // 3+8 = 11 / 2X3 = 6 / 11+6 = 17 17 = Q
Q drop 3823 date/time 02/01/2020 17:48:51 (ZULU)
February 1st / 4 emails / 17 // 1+4=5 Q
"It was total bullshit because I was deplatformed on 17 minutes at 9:48 PM on February 1st."
"on 17 minutes at 9:48 PM on February 1st."
Time of drop 3823 is 17:48:51 PM = 5:48:51 PM
on is the wrong word, that makes on a code marker.
The correct word to use here is "after"
The wrong word is a 2 letter word, the correct word is a 5 letter word.
Q has already indicated a 5 will figure in the coding.
9 / Nine / Nien German sound for "no" - mirror of "on" - no 9 in string - remove.
30 October anniversary of what is quintessentially the Great American Hoax, Orson Welles broadcast of The War Of The Worlds. That raises all "red flags" that are date related. So start checking for anything hinky having to with dates, 1 February... check deltas till a Q drop appears to match... attempt decode.
In this case, Q drop 3823 is literally flaged and the numbers can be manipulated to achieve a 17 = Q marker. The rest... well, the rest is just the rest. Pattern recognition. Things that are there, things that are not there, things that have equivalencies ( 9 / Nien // on flips to no). Also... something that sounds as strange as it is to write... you don't solve the puzzle or break the comms code linearly.
When there is specificity in or about a thing, in this instance, the time being given was irrelevant to the narrative (and Dr. Shiva would not naturally waste a breath on something irrelevant), the use of the wrong word, "on" instead of "after", these are red flags for encoding coming from someone as well spoken and as well educated as Dr. Shiva. This is the opposite of the dog that didn't bark... this is a dog that barks too much. A better analogy would be a guitar string that is out of tune. The question always is, is the string out of tune naturally or is the string out of tune unnaturally. You can only know in context. Knowing that the Cyber Symposium was a hoax, an Orson Welles War Of The Worlds... when I heard Dr. Shiva say October 30 I just started to dig. This is not difficult if you know where to dig and what to look for, and that there are Easter eggs just about everywhere.
Here's the twist. Shiva is in on it, too.
Here is a link to his presentation at the Cyber Symposium:
09:15 "I had to learn case law. I filed my own law suit. On October 30 we had a
...........hearing in Federal Court."
13:02 "On February 1st, once again I shared those 4 emails, screenshots,
...........once again exposing the state election supervisor of Massachusettes,
...........and within 17 minutes I'm deplatformed."
25:15 "Our lawsuit had evolved from October 30th."
26:20 "Twitter filed a false statement. Because she has to show that Twitter did
...........it on their own. You follow what I'm saying, that the government wasn't
...........involved. So she files an affidavit saying 'On February 1st, when we
...........deplatformed Dr. Shiva, we saw his tweet, we had our internal review
...........on February 2nd, on February 3rd we knocked him off after a 3 days
...........of review.' It was total bullshit because I was deplatformed on 17
...........minutes at 9:48 PM on February 1st."
Pull on Q drop 3823 with Time Zone set for ZULU time
https://qagg.news/?q=%23%233823
3823 // 3+8 = 11 / 2X3 = 6 / 11+6 = 17 17 = Q
Q drop 3823 date/time 02/01/2020 17:48:51 (ZULU)
February 1st / 4 emails / 17 // 1+4=5 Q
"It was total bullshit because I was deplatformed on 17 minutes at 9:48 PM on February 1st."
"on 17 minutes at 9:48 PM on February 1st."
Time of drop 3823 is 17:48:51 PM = 5:48:51 PM
on is the wrong word, that makes on a code marker.
The correct word to use here is "after"
The wrong word is a 2 letter word, the correct word is a 5 letter word.
Q has already indicated a 5 will figure in the coding.
9 / Nine / Nien German sound for "no" - mirror of "on" - no 9 in string - remove.
30 October anniversary of what is quintessentially the Great American Hoax, Orson Welles broadcast of The War Of The Worlds. That raises all "red flags" that are date related. So start checking for anything hinky having to with dates, 1 February... check deltas till a Q drop appears to match... attempt decode.
In this case, Q drop 3823 is literally flaged and the numbers can be manipulated to achieve a 17 = Q marker. The rest... well, the rest is just the rest. Pattern recognition. Things that are there, things that are not there, things that have equivalencies ( 9 / Nien // on flips to no). Also... something that sounds as strange as it is to write... you don't solve the puzzle or break the comms code linearly.
When there is specificity in or about a thing, in this instance, the time being given was irrelevant to the narrative (and Dr. Shiva would not naturally waste a breath on something irrelevant), the use of the wrong word, "on" instead of "after", these are red flags for encoding coming from someone as well spoken and as well educated at Dr. Shiva. This is the opposite of the dog that didn't bark... this is a dog that barks too much. A better analogy would be a guitar string that is out of tune. The question always is, is the string out of tune naturally or is the string out of tune unnaturally. You can only know in context. Knowing that the Cyber Symposium was a hoax, an Orson Welles War Of The Worlds... when I heard Dr. Shiva say October 30 I just started to dig. This is not difficult if you know where to dig and what to look for, and that there are Easter eggs just about everywhere.