That’s what they do in hockey.

A coach can challenge a call made by the referee, or even a missed call.

If after review of footage it’s proven the coach’s accusation is wrong, his team is the one that incurs a penalty.

Before the penalty portion was added, coaches would abuse the system to delay games and rest his players while the referees review footage. Since the penalty was added, coaches are much more careful about when they challenge or accuse.

Lying and false accusations in court should meet a similar punishment.

That’s what they do in hockey.

A coach can challenge a call made by the referee, or even a missed call.

If after review of footage it’s proven the coach’s accusation is wrong, his team is the one that incurs a penalty.

Before the penalty portion was added, coaches would abuse the system to delay games and rest his players while the referees review footage. Since the penalty was added, coaches are much more careful about when they challenge or accuse.

Lying and false accusations in court should meet a similar penalty.

That’s what they do in hockey.

A coach can challenge a call made by the referee, or even a missed call.

If after review of footage it’s proven the coach’s accusation is wrong, his team is the one that incurs a penalty.

Before the penalty portion was added, coaches would abuse the system to delay games and rest his players while the referees review footage. Since the penalty was added, coaches are much more careful about when they challenge or accuse.