Well to be clear about abortions: In Poland we have 3 reasons:
when pregnancy poses a treat for pregnant woman's life or health;
rape or incest
when prenatal tests or other medical conditions indicate a high probability of severe and irreversible impairment of the fetus or an incurable life-threatening disease
As third is recognised as allowing eugenics it was declared unconstitutional but because rulling party made too much changes about judical system so constitutional court was called by opposition "government puppet" it was heavily attacked by our leftists and this reason was so not removed. It should be removed or at least be changed to "severe irreversible and deadly impairment."
While in theory most fanatical religious people claim it shall be illegal every time those 2 reasons are for me only reasonable ones beyond discussion:
when pregnancy poses a treat for pregnant woman's life or health;
rape or incest
In fact rape or incest means threat for woman's life or health (psychological),so it all can be explained really as self defence. Self defence which in normal life justifies also killing adult person if there is no other mean of defending yourself - and as technology to move fetus somewhere else not is available... So long abortion shall be allowed in those 2 situations.
Widespread abortion is however pure evil,and using fetus organs like planned parenthood does is evil - dead fetus is human and thus deserves proper burial. Using deceased people bodies without their informed and conscious consent is unethical,criminal and evil really - even when it is about saving other people life. And saving other people life or health is the only one condition where using dead human body seems a bit justified. In none other way than self-defence however.
Things like decorations or diamonds from bodies,stuffing dead people, adenochrome and so on are obvious abominations which shall be punished,purged without mercy.
Well to be clear about abortions: In Poland we have 3 reasons:
when pregnancy poses a treat for pregnant woman's life or health; rape or incest when prenatal tests or other medical conditions indicate a high probability of severe and irreversible impairment of the fetus or an incurable life-threatening disease
As third is recognised as allowing eugenics it was declared unconstitutional but because rulling party made too much changes about judical system so constitutional court was called by opposition "government puppet" it was heavily attacked by our leftists and this reason was so not removed. It should be removed or at least be changed to "severe irreversible and deadly impairment."
While in theory most fanatical religious people claim it shall be illegal every time those 2 reasons are for me only reasonable ones beyond discussion:
when pregnancy poses a treat for pregnant woman's life or health;
rape or incest
In fact rape or incest means threat for woman's life or health (psychological),so it all can be explained really as self defence. Self defence which in normal life justifies also killing adult person if there is no other mean of defending yourself - and as technology to move fetus somewhere else not is available... So long abortion shall be allowed in those 2 situations.
Widespread abortion is however pure evil,and using fetus organs like planned parenthood does is evil - dead fetus is human and thus deserves proper burial. Using deceased people bodies without their informed and conscious consent is unethical,criminal and evil really - even when it is about saving other people life. And saving other people life or health is the only one condition where using dead human body seems a bit justified. In none other way than self-defence however.
Things like decorations or diamonds from bodies,stuffing dead people, adenochrome and so on are obvious abominations which shall be punished,purged without mercy.
Well to be clear about abortions: In Poland we have 3 reasons:
when pregnancy poses a treat for pregnant woman's life or health; rape or incest when prenatal tests or other medical conditions indicate a high probability of severe and irreversible impairment of the fetus or an incurable life-threatening disease
As third is recognised as allowing eugenics it was declared unconstitutional but because rulling party made too much changes about judical system so constitutional court was called by opposition "government puppet" it was heavily attacked by our leftists and this reason was so not removed. It should be removed or at least be changed to "severe irreversible and deadly impairment."
While in theory most fanatical religious people claim it shall be illegal every time those 2 reasons are for me only reasonable ones beyond discussion:
when pregnancy poses a treat for pregnant woman's life or health;
rape or incest
In fact rape or incest means threat for woman's life or health (psychological),so it all can be explained really as self defence. Self defence which in normal life justifies also killing adult person if there is no other mean of defending yourself - and as technology to move fetus somewhere else not is available... So long abortion shall be allowed in those 2 situations.
Widespread abortion is however pure evil,and using fetus organs like planned parenthood does is evil - dead fetus is human and thus deserves proper burial. Using deceased people bodies without their informed and conscious consent is unethical,criminal and evil really - even when it is about saving other people life. And saving other people life or health is the only one condition where using dead human body seems a bit justified. In none other way than self-defence however.
Things like decorations or diamonds from bodies,adenochrome and so on are obvious abominations which shall be punished,purged without mercy.