Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

FTA

...unmodified genes were products of nature and therefore not patent eligible subject matter.

...otherwise unmodified DNA should not be patent eligible, but that cDNA should be patent eligible.

~Supreme Court Ruling 2013

So it appears that if/once our genetic code is modified (MRNA vax?) we become patentable—or someone’s intellectual property—is how I read this, unfortunately.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

FTA

...unmodified genes were products of nature and therefore not patent eligible subject matter. ... otherwise unmodified DNA should not be patent eligible, but that cDNA should be patent eligible.

~Supreme Court Ruling 2013

So it appears that if/once our genetic code is modified (MRNA vax?) we become patentable—or someone’s intellectual property—is how I read this, unfortunately.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

FTA

... otherwise unmodified DNA should not be patent eligible, but that cDNA should be patent eligible. ~Supreme Court Ruling 2013 So it appears that if/once our genetic code is modified (MRNA vax?) we become patentable—or someone’s intellectual property—is how I read this, unfortunately.

3 years ago
1 score