Thanks for the calculations. The question I have is -- How many more are there not being reported? This is the UK and historically their government agencies 'LIE a lot' and consistently 'LIE a lot'. If these UK 'reported' numbers are anything like the CDC's VAER reporting system, in normal times there is estimated a 1 to 10 percent reporting of all the adverse effects. However, we are not living in normal times, so we can deduce the 1 to 10 percent reporting is far worse than this.

If we assume the UK reporting numbers are similar to VAERS, and this is the best we have for correcting the record, what does it do to your numbers then? Mind you, we can also assume the UK is not living in normal times either. It may be far worse than here in the United States.

Is your percentage dead of vaccinated not the 90 +679, but rather (9000 + 67900)/39,709,325 = 0.001936572 = 0.19% or 1 in 516.37 odds?

"So the vaccinated are only slightly better off, based on number of deaths only."

Is your Percentage dead from Covid-19 of England's unvaccinated a bloated number mired with massive false reporting? Is this 390 number really a hundred times smaller due to cases of pneumonia and influenza along with other health conditions and comorbidities being counted as COVID-19 thus conflating the COVID death numbers? What happened to all the influenza deaths in 2020? They disappeared! First time this ever happened? Now the WHO and CDC admit their COVID testing cannot distinguish between COVID and influenza. The fraud is far worse than this too.

Is your Risk of a bad reaction from the vaccine, not 0.2%, but rather 20% and not 1 in 500, but instead 1 in 5? Is the Risk of death from the vaccine 2.64% of the bad reactions or 1 in 19,000 or is it far worse?

I believe the 100X number is more realistic. My wife had 2 friends die as a result. There seems to be far more people dying than is reported. Is anyone watching the obituaries?