Can I, as an ex-believer in Q and Trump (but one who nevertheless sides with anons and others who know that we are caught in the centre of a massive onion of lies) just say to the people on this site who CONSTANTLY seek to label folk as 'shills' and 'doomers', you do no one any favours through your near-indiscriminate application of labels. This is one of this sites MAJOR failings from my perspective.

The sidebar says, inter alia: "They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc."

Don't be 'They'. Don't be so quick to label. There's perhaps not a single thread I've read on this site in which someone doesn't, in disagreeing with another, whop out the old 'shill' card. It really is the Poe's Law of GAW. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shadowy government agent, sent in as a mole to disrupt. The level of ego it takes to believe that the only reason people don't see things the way you see them is because they are a trained and paid government agent is firstly astounding and secondly can be really quite cringeworthy to see.

Frankly, if there are such agents on this site then you really should be looking firstly at those who throw that accusation around so lightly, given it's clear intent to ostracise, to label, to divide, to stymie discussion and ultimately to turn GAW into a silo.

I am aware that something in the background and atmosphere of this site has already led to a schism and a rival equivalent site. You need to learn your lessons there.

Even though I am not a believer in Q as a force for good, a lot of what he said was good advice and enlightening. It's a shame to see the better parts of it inverted in this manner.

Can I, as an ex-believer in Q and Trump (but one who nevertheless sides with anons and others who know that we are caught in the centre of a massive onion of lies) just say to the people on this site who CONSTANTLY seek to label folk as 'shills' and 'doomers', you do no one any favours through your near-indiscriminate application of labels. This is one of this sites MAJOR failings from my perspective.

The sidebar says, inter alia: "They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc."

Don't be 'They'. Don't be so quick to label. There's perhaps not a single thread I've read on this site in which someone doesn't, in disagreeing with another, whop out the old 'shill' card. It really is the Poe's Law of GAW. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shadowy government agent, sent in as a mole to disrupt. The level of ego it takes to believe that the only reason people don't see things the way you see them is because they are a trained and paid government agent is firstly astounding and secondly can be really quite cringeworthy to see.

Frankly, if there are such agents on this site then you really should be looking firstly at those who throw that accusation around so lightly, given it's clear intent to ostracise, to label, to divide, to stymie discussion and ultimately to turn GAW into a silo.

I am aware that something in the background and atmosphere of this site has already led to a schism and a rival equivalent site. You need to learn your lessons there.

Even though I am not a believer in Q as a force for good, a lot of what he said was good advice and enlightening. It's a shame to see the best parts of it inverted in this manner.

Can I, as an ex-believer in Q and Trump (but one who nevertheless sides with anons and others who know that we are caught in the centre of a massive onion of lies) just say to the people on this site who CONSTANTLY seek to label folk as 'shills' and 'doomers', you do no one any favours through your near-indiscriminate application of labels. This is one of this sites MAJOR failings from my perspective.

The sidebar says, inter alia: "They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc."

Don't be 'They'. Don't be so quick to label. There's perhaps not a single thread I've read on this site in which someone doesn't, in disagreeing with another, whop out the old 'shill' card. It really is the Poe's Law of GAW. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shadowy government agent, sent in as a mole to disrupt. The level of ego it takes to believe that the only reason people don't see things the way you see them is because they are a trained and paid government agent is firstly astounding and secondly can be really quite cringeworthy to see.

Frankly, if there are such agents on this site then you really should be looking firstly at those who throw that accusation around so lightly, given it's clear intent to ostracise, to label, to divide, to stymie discussion and ultimately to turn GAW and anons into a silo.

I am aware that something in the background and atmosphere of this site has already led to a schism and a rival equivalent site. You need to learn your lessons there.

Even though I am not a believer in Q as a force for good, a lot of what he said was good advice and enlightening. It's a shame to see the best parts of it inverted in this manner.

Can I, as an ex-believer in Q and Trump (but one who nevertheless sides with anons and others who know that we are caught in the centre of a massive onion of lies) just say to the people on this site who CONSTANTLY seek to label folk as 'shills' and 'doomers', you do no one any favours through your near-indiscriminate application of labels. This is one of this sites MAJOR failings from my perspective.

The sidebar says, inter alia: "They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc."

Don't be 'They'. Don't be so quick to label. There's perhaps not a single thread I've read on this site in which someone doesn't, in disagreeing with another, whop out the old 'shill' card. It really is the Poe's Law of GAW. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shadowy government agent, sent in as a mole to disrupt.

Frankly, if there are such agents on this site then you really should be looking firstly at those who throw that accusation around so lightly, given it's clear intent to ostracise, to label, to divide, to stymie discussion and ultimately to turn GAW and anons into a silo.

I am aware that something in the background and atmosphere of this site has already led to a schism and a rival equivalent site. You need to learn your lessons there.

Even though I am not a believer in Q as a force for good, a lot of what he said was good advice and enlightening. It's a shame to see the best parts of it inverted in this manner.

Can I, as a ex-believer in Q and Trump (but one who nevertheless sides with anons and others who know that we are caught in the centre of a massive onion of lies) just say to the people on this site who CONSTANTLY seek to label folk as 'shills' and 'doomers', you do no one any favours through your near-indiscriminate application of labels. This is one of this sites MAJOR failings from my perspective.

The sidebar says, inter alia: "They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc."

Don't be 'They'. Don't be so quick to label. There's perhaps not a single thread I've read on this site in which someone doesn't, in disagreeing with another, whop out the old 'shill' card. It really is the Poe's Law of GAW. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shadowy government agent, sent in as a mole to disrupt.

Frankly, if there are such agents on this site then you really should be looking firstly at those who throw that accusation around so lightly, given it's clear intent to ostracise, to label, to divide, to stymie discussion and ultimately to turn GAW and anons into a silo.

I am aware that something in the background and atmosphere of this site has already led to a schism and a rival equivalent site. You need to learn your lessons there.

Even though I am not a believer in Q as a force for good, a lot of what he said was good advice and enlightening. It's a shame to see the best parts of it inverted in this manner.

Can I, as a non-believer in Q and Trump (but one who nevertheless sides with anons and others who know that we are caught in the centre of a massive onion of lies) just say to the people on this site who CONSTANTLY seek to label folk as 'shills' and 'doomers', you do no one any favours through your near-indiscriminate application of labels. This is one of this sites MAJOR failings from my perspective.

The sidebar says, inter alia: "They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc."

Don't be 'They'. Don't be so quick to label. There's perhaps not a single thread I've ever read on this site in which someone, disagreeing with another, whops out the old 'shill' card. It really is the Poe's Law of GAW. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a shadowy government agent, sent in as a mole to disrupt.

Frankly, if there are such agents on this site then you really should be looking firstly at those who throw that accusation around so lightly, given it's clear intent to ostracise, to label, to divide, to stymie discussion and ultimately to turn GAW and anons into a silo.

I am aware that something in the background and atmosphere of this site has already led to a schism and a rival equivalent site. You need to learn your lessons there.

Even though I am not a believer in Q as a force for good, a lot of what he said was good advice and enlightening. It's a shame to see the best parts of it inverted in this manner.