Just like the battles that everyone else is fighting in the courts on the illegality of actions based on bad "science," the health care community takes its guidance from the AMA, CDC, FDA, HHS, and others. A state medical board can only operate within the "evidence based" guidelines as set down by those entities in determining whether or not a license holder stepped outside of the boundaries of a recognized standard of care. Usually an action is taken against a particular licensee due to a complaint filed - mostly from the public or an institution, such as a hospital.

As far as that larger medical community is concerned, there are large numbers of health care workers that are fighting back and many are losing their jobs and careers for taking a stand. This will have little effect on state licensing boards. They are controlled by State Legislative processes through Medical Practice Acts voted on by lawmakers after public debate and consent - in other words, the people. So, unless there is outcry from the public when practitioners are targeted and threatened with losing their license for offering treatments that the powers to be in the ivory towers do not approve, nothing will change. Those boards are there for the public - or at least they are supposed to be. The public needs to demand change because they are ultimately the ones that control the Legislature and thereby the boards. Did you see the Ohio case about a judge that ordered a hospital to treat with Ivermectin? The pushback must rise from the public - you get the healthcare you demand.