I'll have to change that wording ("grateful").
Notwithstanding, you have a legal right to informed consent. It is a way of forcing them to find these answers for you. And to make them aware of what is in the jab. Recent studies show the vast majority of it is graphene oxide (GO), which is a deadly carcinogen. Getting them to provide you answers for informed consent also builds your legal case because no business can fire you for not taking an experimental 'gene therapy' treatment, especially if you are religiously exempt. It doesn't matter what religion you are or what your beliefs are. Even an atheist is a religion. That's the gimmick. One does not have to, or should not state what their religion is this anyway. It is not required by law. All that needs to be said -- "I am religiously exempt." There really is no difference between personal belief exemption and religious belief exemption. Your State of Washington has a religious belief exemption, but not a personal belief exemption. This law, Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 28A.210.080, 90, is for students, but gives credence to your case. There is no law for mandating vaxxination for adults, period. As I said they are really the same, but one should use their language. So in your State, a religious belief exemption is the only wording.
The threat of firing is a canard and I doubt they would carried it out. This is all high stakes pressure to get people to conform. They can threaten all they want, but can't fire without putting themselves in great legal jeopardy, especially after saying you are "religiously exempt". The Informed consent questions only helps builds your legal case against them.
I'll have to change that wording ("grateful").
Notwithstanding, you have a legal right to informed consent. It is a way of forcing them to find these answers for you. And to make them aware of what is in the jab. Recent studies show the vast majority of it is graphene oxide (GO), which is a deadly carcinogen. Getting them to provide you answers for informed consent also builds your legal case because no business can fire you for not taking an experimental 'gene therapy' treatment, especially if you are religiously exempt. It doesn't matter what religion you are or what your beliefs are. Even an atheist is a religion. That's the gimmick. One does not have to, or should not state what their religion is this anyway. It is not required by law. All that needs to be said -- "I am religiously exempt." There really is no difference between personal belief exemption and religious belief exemption. Your State of Washington has a religious belief exemption, but not a personal belief exemption. This law, Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 28A.210.080, 90, is for students, but gives credence to your case. There is no law for mandating vaxxination for adults, period. As I said they are really the same, but one should use their language. So in your State, a religious belief exemption is the only wording.
The threat of firing is a canard and I doubt they it would be carried out. This is all high stakes pressure to get people to conform. They can threaten all they want, but can't fire without putting themselves in great legal jeopardy, especially after saying you are "religiously exempt". The Informed consent questions only helps builds your legal case against them.
I'll have to change that wording ("grateful"). Notwithstanding, you have a legal right to informed consent. It is a way of forcing them to find these answers for you. And to make them aware of what is in the jab. Recent studies show the vast majority of it is graphene oxide (GO), which is a deadly carcinogen. Getting them to provide you answers for informed consent also builds your legal case because no business can fire you for not taking an experimental 'gene therapy' treatment, especially if you are religiously exempt. It doesn't matter what religion you are or what your beliefs are. Even an atheist is a religion. That's the gimmick. One does not have to, or should not state what their religion is this anyway. It is not required by law. All that needs to be said -- "I am religiously exempt." There really is no difference between personal belief exemption and religious belief exemption. Your State of Washington has a religious belief exemption, but not a personal belief exemption. This law, Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 28A.210.080, 90, is for students, but gives credence to your case. There is no law for mandating vaxxination for adults, period. As I said they are really the same, but one should use their language. So in your State, a religious belief exemption is the only wording.
The threat of firing is a canard and I doubt they it would be carried out. This is all high stakes pressure to get people to conform. They can threaten all they want, but can't fire without putting themselves in great legal jeopardy, especially after saying you are "religiously exempt". The Informed consent questions only helps builds your legal case against them.
I'll have to change that wording ("grateful"). Notwithstanding, you have a legal right to informed consent. It is a way of forcing them to find these answers for you. And to make them aware of what is in the jab. Recent studies show the vast majority of it is graphene oxide (GO), which is a deadly carcinogen. Getting them to provide you answers for informed consent also builds your legal case because no business can fire you for not taking an experimental 'gene therapy' treatment, especially if you are religiously exempt. It doesn't matter what religion you are or what your beliefs are. All that needs to be said -- "I am religiously exempt."
The threat of firing is a canard and I doubt they it would be carried out. This is all high stakes pressure to get people to conform. They can threaten all they want, but can't fire without putting themselves in great legal jeopardy, especially after saying you are "religiously exempt". The Informed consent questions only helps builds your legal case against them.