I appreciate the appreciation, even if we're on other sides of this.

I don't think the means of how the camera was carried makes a difference: if the evidence came in the commission of a crime, then it's not admissible.

Hence, why I can't beat a confession out of someone and use that in court. Because even if it's a true confession, I committed battery (and probably other crimes) in order to obtain it, and the legal system, as an ideal, cannot permit crimes to be carried out in the name of justice.

We both know it doesn't always work out like that, but if anyone is going to have to do things EXACTLY by the book to get the legal system to cooperate, it's going to be a former POTUS who is attempting to benefit from a crime that is being labeled as an insurrection cause by his supporters. That's an uphill battle for Trump, as has been demonstrated by his lack of legal successes when it comes to proving election fraud so far.

I'm a skeptic. I'm willing to be convinced by evidence. But so far, what Q offers is the POTENTIAL that there could be evidence out there. That's it.

If only Trump would declas, then we'd have the evidence.

If only the audit would be released, then we'd have the evidence.

If only Powell releases the Kraken, then we'd have the evidence.

If only Dominion stupidly opens themselves up to unregulated discovery without a fucking clue, then we'd have the evidence.

If only Lindell shows the PCAPs, then we'd have the evidence.

If only we had those routers, then we'd have the evidence.

If only we could get a single Deep Stater to flip, then we'd have the evidence.

If only x, then we'd have the evidence.

As I've said a few times today, science and logic is about using evidence to predict the future.

I will not make predictions about the future, and in the process change my worldview, on the promise that evidence will be here soon. That promise has existed since the beginning of Q. Frankly, you guys have sacrificed so much for that promise, and I just can't bring myself to sacrifice my family and friends and job and legal freedom just because someone might eventually prove me wrong about reality.

If the proof comes, I'm ready for it. I've been ready for it. But until then, I remain a skeptic.

I appreciate the appreciation, even if we're on other sides of this.

I don't think the means of how the camera was carried makes a difference: if the evidence came in the commission of a crime, then it's not admissible.

Hence, why I can't beat a confession out of someone and use that in court. Because even if it's a true confession, I committed battery (and probably other crimes) in order to obtain it, and the legal system, as an ideal, cannot permit crimes to be carried out in the name of justice.

We both know it doesn't always work out like that, but if anyone is going to have to do things EXACTLY by the book to get the legal system to cooperate, it's going to be a former POTUS who is attempting to benefit from a crime that is being labeled as an insurrection by his own supporters. That's an uphill battle for Trump, as has been demonstrated by his lack of legal successes when it comes to proving election fraud so far.

I'm a skeptic. I'm willing to be convinced by evidence. But so far, what Q offers is the POTENTIAL that there could be evidence out there. That's it.

If only Trump would declas, then we'd have the evidence.

If only the audit would be released, then we'd have the evidence.

If only Powell releases the Kraken, then we'd have the evidence.

If only Dominion stupidly opens themselves up to unregulated discovery without a fucking clue, then we'd have the evidence.

If only Lindell shows the PCAPs, then we'd have the evidence.

If only we had those routers, then we'd have the evidence.

If only we could get a single Deep Stater to flip, then we'd have the evidence.

If only x, then we'd have the evidence.

As I've said a few times today, science and logic is about using evidence to predict the future.

I will not make predictions about the future, and in the process change my worldview, on the promise that evidence will be here soon. That promise has existed since the beginning of Q. Frankly, you guys have sacrificed so much for that promise, and I just can't bring myself to sacrifice my family and friends and job and legal freedom just because someone might eventually prove me wrong about reality.

If the proof comes, I'm ready for it. I've been ready for it. But until then, I remain a skeptic.