The legal precedent goes back to 1905 Jacobson v Massachusetts.
What should be challenged, however, is the fruit of the poison tree: these compulsory mandates are based on deception and collusion; they do not meet the public health principle argued in Jacobson.
• the EUA only possible by collusion to suppress alternative therapeutics and prophylactics
• mRNA gene therapy EUA only possible by collusion to regulate as traditional vaccines
• vaccine deceptively claimed effective by restricting the measure of effectiveness to the ‘presence antibodies by certain week post injection’; implying rather than establishing “immunity”
• the definition of “vaccine” was changed arbitrarily to fit mRNA effectiveness, not the other way around
• adverse events are unacceptably high — lack of action to halt distribution shows extreme bias on behalf of manufacturers over credible physician groups calling for pause to reevaluate product safety
• the very nature of Informed Consent is voluntary and requires transparency
• the products are still experimental and participation in medical experiments cannot be under coercion, threats, or intimidation
The legal precedent goes back to 1905 Jacobson v Massachusetts.
What should be challenged, however, is the fruit of the poison tree: these compulsory mandates are based on deception and collusion; they do not meet the public health principle argued in Jacobson.
• the EUA only possible by collusion to suppress alternative therapeutics and prophylactics
• mRNA gene therapy EUA only possible by collusion to regulate as traditional vaccines
• vaccine deceptively claimed effective by restricting the measure of effectiveness to the ‘presence antibodies by certain week post injection’; implying rather than establishing “immunity”
• the definition of “vaccine” was changed arbitrarily to fit mRNA effectiveness, not the other way around
• adverse events are unacceptably high — lack of action to halt distribution shows extreme bias on behalf of manufacturers over credible physician groups calling for pause to reevaluate product safety
• the very nature of Informed Consent is voluntary and requires transparency
The legal precedent goes back to 1905 Jacobson v Massachusetts.
What should be challenged, however, is the fruit of the poison tree: these compulsory mandates are based on deception and collusion; they do not meet the public health principle argued in Jacobson.
• the EUA only possible by collusion to suppress alternative therapeutics and prophylactics
• mRNA gene therapy EUA only possible by collusion to regulate as traditional vaccines
• vaccine deceptively claimed effective by restricting the measure of effectiveness to the ‘presence antibodies by certain week post injection’; implying rather than establishing “immunity”
• the definition of “vaccine” was changed arbitrarily to fit mRNA effectiveness, not the other way around
• adverse events are unacceptably high — lack of action to halt distribution shows extreme bias on behalf of manufacturers over credible physician groups calling for pause to reevaluate product safety