The Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, much like a Tomahawk we still use to destroy targets from Warships.

Source: Me. 24 yr War Vet, trained as an Aircraft Mishap Investigator (one MANY hats I wore), and 1st-hand up close (touching) knowledge of the aftermath of a cruise missile strike on buildings.

In Iraq, for one of many examples, there were 30-story business towers whose base floors were near half way blown out and the damn thing was still standing. Holes in other buildings were identical to the one in the Pentagon: Massive impact destruction, a little fire from leftover burnables, but NOTHING like an aircraft loaded with jet fuel. Had a an aircraft truly hit that, massive burning would have ensued all over...both in and outside that building impact site. Yet the grass was green, nothing was shown to have been warped by intense heat and the only fire was INSIDE where wood, paper, and other burnables were located.

Aside from this, coming from my AMIC background, lets state something obvious: The engines of an aircraft are the heaviest and most dense metals any aircraft has. Typically made of Alloy steels, Magnesium (some not all), Titanium, and other extremely tough alloys to withstand the rigors of jet propulsion.

With the above in mind, and the alleged aircraft punch through: Where's the luggage strewn about of a full plane? None. Bodies? None. Do you see any impact points of 2-4 (depending on aircraft) LARGE dense engines on the initial entry? None. If those engines impacted, you WOULD see 2-4 small impact points, as the hole is smaller than the wingspan. A commercial airliner doesnt fold its wings up like a kingfisher duck before it crashes, it goes full-on swan dive all the way. You WOULD see those engine hits, yet they arent there. OP's video shows this, as do initial photos before the collapse.

With that in mind, what you DO see is a perfectly punched hole that went thru all rings, the smallest hole ending in the interior courtyard. THAT is what a cruise missile with a penetrator warhead is designed to do. Basically a "bunker buster".

No plane hit that building.

The Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, much like a Tomahawk we still use to destroy targets from Warships.

Source: Me. 24 yr War Vet, trained as an Aircraft Mishap Investigator (one MANY hats I wore), and 1st-hand up close (touching) knowledge of the aftermath of a cruise missile strike on buildings.

In Iraq, for one of many examples, there were 30-story business towers whose base floors were near half way blown out and the damn thing was still standing. Holes in other buildings were identical to the one in the Pentagon: Massive impact destruction, a little fire from leftover burnables, but NOTHING like an aircraft loaded with jet fuel. Had a an aircraft truly hit that, massive burning would have ensued all over...both in and outside that building impact site. Yet the grass was green, nothing was shown to have been warped by intense heat and the only fire was INSIDE where wood, paper, and other burnables were located.

Aside from this, coming from my AMIC background, lets state something obvious: The engines of an aircraft are the heaviest and most dense metals any aircraft has. Typically made of Alloy steels, Magnesium (some not all), Titanium, and other extremely tough alloys to withstand the rigors of jet propulsion.

With the above in mind, and the alleged aircraft punch through: Do you see any impact points of 2-4 (depending on aircraft) LARGE dense engines on the initial entry? None. If those engines impacted, you WOULD see 2-4 small impact points, as the hole is smaller than the wingspan. A commercial airliner doesnt fold its wings up like a kingfisher duck before it crashes, it goes full-on swan dive all the way. You WOULD see those engine hits, yet they arent there. OP's video shows this, as do initial photos before the collapse.

With that in mind, what you DO see is a perfectly punched hole that went thru all rings, the smallest hole ending in the interior courtyard. THAT is what a cruise missile with a penetrator warhead is designed to do. Basically a "bunker buster".

No plane hit that building.

The Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile, much like a Tomahawk we still use to destroy targets from Warships.

Source: Me. 24 yr War Vet, trained as an Aircraft Mishap Investigator (one MANY hats I wore), and 1st-hand up close (touching) knowledge of the aftermath of a cruise missile strike on buildings.

In Iraq, for one of many examples, there were 30-story business towers whose base floors were near half way blown out and the damn thing was still standing. Holes in other buildings were identical to the one in the Pentagon: Massive impact destruction, a little fire from leftover burnables, but NOTHING like an aircraft loaded with jet fuel. Had a an aircraft truly hit that, massive burning would have ensued all over...both in and outside that building impact site. Yet the grass was green, nothing was shown to have been warped by intense heat and the only fire was INSIDE where wood, paper, and other burnables were located.

Aside from this, coming from my AMIC background, lets state something obvious: The engines of an aircraft are the heaviest and most dense metals any aircraft has. Typically made of Alloy steels, Magnesium (some not all), Titanium, and other extremely tough alloys to withstand the rigors of jet propulsion.

With the above in mind, and the alleged aircraft punch through: Do you see any impact points of 4 LARGE dense engines on the initial entry? None. If those engines impacted, you WOULD see 4 small impact points, as the hole is smaller than the wingspan. A commercial airliner doesnt fold its wings up like a kingfisher duck before it crashes, it goes full-on swan dive all the way. You WOULD see those engine hits, yet they arent there.

With that in mind, what you DO see is a perfectly punched hole that went thru all rings, the smallest hole ending in the interior courtyard. THAT is what a cruise missile with a penetrator warhead is designed to do. Basically a "bunker buster".

No plane hit that building.