The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence on (and creation of) the Jacobins (the first Antifa), which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide and causing that discord within the population allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions. In such a population there is always a very clear enemy. If you have a clear enemy you don't look for a hidden enemy; the pullers of strings.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals working towards a common goal (finding the truth e.g.) will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

We The People are all smart enough. We are all one team. When we are all one team, it is trivially simple to see who the real enemy is and the tools they use to manipulate us.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence on (and creation of) the Jacobins (the first Antifa), which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide and causing that discord within the population allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions. In such a population there is always a very clear enemy. If you have a clear enemy you don't look for a hidden enemy; the pullers of strings.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

We The People are all smart enough. We are all one team. When we are all one team, it is trivially simple to see who the real enemy is and the tools they use to manipulate us.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence on (and creation of) the Jacobins (the first Antifa), which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide and causing that discord within the population, allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions. In such a population there is always a very clear enemy. If you have a clear enemy you don't look for a hidden enemy; the pullers of strings.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

We The People are all smart enough. We are all one team. When we are all one team, it is trivially simple to see who the real enemy is and the tools they use to manipulate us.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence (and creation of) the Jacobins (the first Antifa), which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide and causing that discord within the population, allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions. In such a population there is always a very clear enemy. If you have a clear enemy you don't look for a hidden enemy; the pullers of strings.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

We The People are all smart enough. We are all one team. When we are all one team, it is trivially simple to see who the real enemy is and the tools they use to manipulate us.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence (and creation of) the Jacobins (the first Antifa), which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide and causing that discord within the population, allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions. In such a population there is always a very clear enemy. If you have a clear enemy you don't look for a hidden enemy; the pullers of strings.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence (and creation of) the Jacobians, which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide and causing that discord within the population, allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions. In such a population there is always a very clear enemy. If you have a clear enemy you don't look for a hidden enemy; the pullers of strings.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence (and creation of) the Jacobians, which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide, causing that discord within the population allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions. In such a population there is always a very clear enemy. If you have a clear enemy you don't look for a hidden enemy; the pullers of strings.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence (and creation of) the Jacobians, which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide, causing that discord within the population allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to learn to think for ourselves.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence (and creation of) the Jacobians, which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide, causing that discord within the population allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something. I think we are all smart enough to think for ourselves.

The concept of left vs right on the political spectrum 100% exists and has for centuries across multiple continents

I 100% agree that it has existed for centuries across multiple continents. Looking at history a little deeper I realized that these categories were created by the Bankers to control the population. You can see it in their influence (and creation of) the Jacobians, which began the French Revolution. Of course justifying that requires a fair bit more evidence, but I invite you to look a little deeper yourself as I am too busy to do a real deep dive for you right now.

A divided population never looks at the pullers of strings. As a population begins to realize they are just as much a person as their rulers (sovereign citizens), creating a political divide, causing that discord within the population allows for control of the entire population. It has always been the tactic of the leadership to create a population division. But over the past few centuries, the hidden government has used it to not only control the entire population, but keep themselves from being discovered.

There is no reason to have a two party system. In fact, it makes no sense whatsoever. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, you get 100 opinions. When 100 people walk into a room for a debate, and you make them put on a red shirt or blue shirt as they come in the door, you get two opinions. It is MUCH easier to control a population with two opinions than 100 opinions.

For policy making, debate, explorations of truth, any human endeavor, having the input from 100 individuals will always provide a superior result than when you divide that group into teams. The fewer teams, the better the control from an outside source. One team won't work, because if its one team then there is no one to argue with, and it goes back to 100 individual opinions. Thus the ideal "two teams" of ultimate shadow control.

Tbh you have the same mindset as the vaccine-tyrants, but for a different purpose on a different issue. They use the exact same logic - thay we are too stupid to see through Trumps lies and need to be shown the light.

I have absolutely no idea how you got this idea of my thoughts (or came to this conclusion) from anything I have said.

I never said anyone was stupid at all. I said we need to learn to think for ourselves. That IS what we need to learn. We all need to learn it, no matter your political leanings or beliefs. Far from anyone being stupid, I think we are all smart enough to learn the skills of critical thinking and discernment. I think we are all smart enough to stop relying on "experts" or "heroes" to tell us what we should think about something.