For starters who ever was responsible for that day we must not for get our countrymen died.

Now. I have a site bookmarked that chronologically compiles all of the newscasts from that day related to the Twin Towers. I will share it when I get back to my computer. One of the things that I noticed is that during the live eyewitness reporting (the reporting done at the actual time of the attack with witnesses) all of the eyewitnesses mention an explosion from 9:34-ish to 10:40-ish in the morning that day. I found this odd because if it were a plane that crashed into those towers I don't think there would have been an initial explosion. Why cars collide for example they don't explode. You hear metal on metal sound, breaking glass and grinding. You don't hear a "KABOOM! you hear a "BAREEECH" sound if that makes sense. This site has led me to believe that it was reverse. A plane hit the Pentagon while I think the Towers were detonated by cruise missiles. That being said I don't rule out the possibility that because a plane has more fuel in it that an explosion is possible at those speeds. At those speed (around 300 mph I think) it pretty much turns a plane into a cruise missile.

My thoughts are this. Given the fact that all of the eyewitnesses interviewed at Ground Zero did not mention a plane BUT mentioned an explosion until around 10:40am the possibility of a missile attack exists where as the witnesses at the Pentagon explicitly say they saw a plane and it was the lying media who claimed it could have been a missile to me make this a switch-up job and the first disinformation action of the attacks and the War on Terror. It's almost like the DS intentionally had the mess ups to add to the disinformation and to distort the picture for posterity.

For starters who ever was responsible for that day we must not for get our countrymen died.

Now. I have a site bookmarked that chronologically compiles all of the newscasts from that day related to the Twin Towers. I will share it when I get back to my computer. One of the things that I noticed is that during the live eyewitness reporting (the reporting done at the actual time of the attack with witnesses) all of the eyewitnesses mention an explosion from 9:34-ish to 10:40-ish in the morning that day. I found this odd because if it were a plane that crashed into those towers I don't think there would have been an initial explosion. Why cars collide for example they don't explode. You hear metal on metal sound, breaking glass and grinding. You don't hear a "KABOOM! you hear a "BAREEECH" sound if that makes sense. This site has led me to believe that it was reverse. A plane hit the Pentagon while I think the Towers were detonated by cruise missiles. That being said I don't rule out the possibility that because a plane has more fuel in it that an explosion is possible at those speeds. At those speed (around 300 mph I think) it pretty much turns a plane into a cruise missile.

My thoughts are this. Given the fact that all of the eyewitnesses interviewed at Ground Zero did not mention a plane BUT mentioned an explosion until around 10:40am the possibility of a missile attack exists where as the witnesses at the Pentagon explicitly say they saw a plane and it was the lying media who claimed it could have been a missile to me make this a bait and switch and the first disinformation action of the attacks and the War on Terror. It's almost like the DS intentionally had the mess ups to add to the disinformation and to distort the picture for posterity.