The point of attaching lies to a Freemason is that you can use the truths to blend the lies.

School brainwashed them into believing those people invented it when all they did was manipulate it and hide the important bits.

This sounds to me like you (and others) are using the ideas that the FM can't be trusted, and using that lack of trust to extend it to these other people not having actually contributed their contributions. I am asking for evidence that those assertions are true. I am not asking for evidence that the FM are liars. I am not asking for evidence that Newton was a FM. Neither of those points are contested.

I am asking for evidence that Newton did not do the work attributed to Newton.

I guess I am also asking for evidence that the work associated with Newton purposefully hid things.

I have yet to see any evidence that supports those statements.

Here is what I see is the logic:

1. FM are liars.
2. Newton was a FM.
3. Everything Newton did was a lie.

That does NOT logically follow. That is an error in logic. I want evidence that links 1 and 2 with 3. I have seen none so far (not counting Calculus for which I have given an argument to the contrary, and concede it might be partially (but not fully) true).