Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Well, considering the standing theory is that the vaccinated people

There is no "standing theory". Suggesting that there is suggests that there is evidence to support the ideas. It is an appeal to authority to support an argument for which there is no good evidence. It would be more appropriate to say "my hypothesis which some (few) other people share".

A. Are sterilized by the shot

There is zero evidence to support this. There is evidence that it causes substantial spontaneous abortions in the first two trimesters, but that can easily be caused by a shock to the system (which the vaccine causes). It can also be caused by permanent damage to the reproductive organs, but there is zero substantive evidence to support that conclusion.

B. Only have 3 years to live due to the cardio problems

This again has zero evidential support. I am sure it is probably true for some people, but the vaccine causes different damage to different people. Not everyone is susceptible to heart damage from the spike protein and/or inflammation/autoimmune heart damage the vaccine might cause. Each individual has different diet/genetics/state of health/where the vaccine accumulates/etc. Patterns may emerge for statistical evidence to support such an idea, but we don't have any data to support ANY long term problems, nor do we have any idea of statistical long term patterns (yet).

C. Were dumb enough to get the jab to begin with

I can't argue with this one.

All point toward parentage with such a person isn't only likely impossible now, but simply irresponsible.

This is nothing but fear mongering, and it doesn't even have a lick of evidential support (that I have seen). All evidence that I have seen that would warrant these particular fears I have provided substantial evidence to the contrary. That evidence being ignored because people would rather be fearful than not is not my fault. But I am calling this for what it is. Fear mongering.

3 years ago
-3 score
Reason: None provided.

Well, considering the standing theory is that the vaccinated people

There is no "standing theory". Suggesting that there is suggests that there is evidence to support the ideas. It would be more appropriate to say "my hypothesis which some (few) other people share".

A. Are sterilized by the shot

There is zero evidence to support this. There is evidence that it causes substantial spontaneous abortions in the first two trimesters, but that can easily be caused by a shock to the system (which the vaccine causes). It can also be caused by permanent damage to the reproductive organs, but there is zero substantive evidence to support that conclusion.

B. Only have 3 years to live due to the cardio problems

This again has zero evidential support. I am sure it is probably true for some people, but the vaccine causes different damage to different people. Not everyone is susceptible to heart damage from the spike protein and/or inflammation/autoimmune heart damage the vaccine might cause. Each individual has different diet/genetics/state of health/where the vaccine accumulates/etc. Patterns may emerge for statistical evidence to support such an idea, but we don't have any data to support ANY long term problems, nor do we have any idea of statistical long term patterns (yet).

C. Were dumb enough to get the jab to begin with

I can't argue with this one.

All point toward parentage with such a person isn't only likely impossible now, but simply irresponsible.

This is nothing but fear mongering, and it doesn't even have a lick of evidential support (that I have seen). All evidence that I have seen that would warrant these particular fears I have provided substantial evidence to the contrary. That evidence being ignored because people would rather be fearful than not is not my fault. But I am calling this for what it is. Fear mongering.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Well, considering the standing theory is that the vaccinated people

There is no "standing theory". Suggesting that there is suggests that there is evidence to support the ideas. It would be more appropriate to say "my hypothesis which some (few) other people share".

A. Are sterilized by the shot

There is zero evidence to support this. There is evidence that it causes substantial spontaneous abortions in the first two trimesters, but that can easily be caused by a shock to the system (which the vaccine causes). It can also be caused by permanent damage to the reproductive organs, but there is zero substantive evidence to support that conclusion.

B. Only have 3 years to live due to the cardio problems

This again has zero evidential support. I am sure it is probably true for some people, but the vaccine causes different damage to different people. Not everyone is susceptible to heart damage from the spike protein and/or inflammation/autoimmune heart damage the vaccine might cause. Each individual has different diet/genetics/state of health/where the vaccine accumulates/etc. Patterns may emerge for statistical evidence to support such an idea, but we don't have any data to support ANY long term problems, nor do we have any idea of statistical long term patterns (yet).

C. Were dumb enough to get the jab to begin with

I can't argue with this one.

All point toward parentage with such a person isn't only likely impossible now, but simply irresponsible.

This is nothing but fear mongering, and it doesn't even have a lick of evidential support (that I have seen). All evidence that I have seen that would warrant these particular fears I have provided substantial evidence to the contrary. That evidence being ignored because people would rather be fearful than not is not my fault. But I am calling this for what it is. Fear mongering.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Well, considering the standing theory is that the vaccinated people

There is no "standing theory". Suggesting that there is suggests that there is evidence to support the ideas. It would be more appropriate to say "my hypothesis which some (few) other people share".

A. Are sterilized by the shot

There is zero evidence to support this. There is evidence that it causes substantial spontaneous abortions in the first two trimesters, but that can easily be caused by a shock to the system (which the vaccine causes). It can also be caused by permanent damage to the reproductive organs, but there is zero substantive evidence to support that conclusion.

B. Only have 3 years to live due to the cardio problems

This again has zero evidential support. I am sure it is probably true for some people, but the vaccine causes different damage to different people. Not everyone is susceptible to heart damage from the spike protein and/or inflammation/autoimmune heart damage the vaccine might cause. Each individual has different diet/genetics/state of health/where the vaccine accumulates/etc. Patterns may emerge for statistical evidence to support such an idea, but we don't have any data to support ANY long term problems, nor do we have any idea of statistical long term patterns (yet).

C. Were dumb enough to get the jab to begin with

I can't argue with this one.

All point toward parentage with such a person isn't only likely impossible now, but simply irresponsible.

This is nothing but fear mongering, and it doesn't even have a lick of evidential support (that I have seen). All evidence that I have seen that would warrant these particular fears I have provided substantial evidence to the contrary. That evidence being ignored because people would rather be fearful than not is not my fault. But I am calling this for what it is. Fear mongering.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Well, considering the standing theory is that the vaccinated people

There is no "standing theory". Suggesting that there is suggests that there is evidence to support the ideas. It would be more appropriate to say "my hypothesis which some (few) other people share".

A. Are sterilized by the shot

There is zero evidence to support this. There is evidence that it causes substantial spontaneous abortions in the first two trimesters, but that can easily be caused by a shock to the system (which the vaccine causes). It can also be caused by permanent damage to the reproductive organs, but there is zero substantive evidence to support that conclusion.

B. Only have 3 years to live due to the cardio problems

This again has zero evidential support. I am sure it is probably true for some people, but the vaccine causes different damage to different people. Not everyone is susceptible to heart damage from the spike protein and/or inflammation/autoimmune heart damage the vaccine might cause because of their diet/genetics/state of health/where the vaccine accumulates in the individual is different for everyone, even if patterns emerge (which aren't well known at this time, especially long term).

C. Were dumb enough to get the jab to begin with

I can't argue with this one.

All point toward parentage with such a person isn't only likely impossible now, but simply irresponsible.

This is nothing but fear mongering, and it doesn't even have a lick of evidential support (that I have seen). All evidence that I have seen that would warrant these particular fears I have provided substantial evidence to the contrary. That evidence being ignored because people would rather be fearful than not is not my fault. But I am calling this for what it is. Fear mongering.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Well, considering the standing theory is that the vaccinated people

There is no "standing theory". Suggesting that there is suggests that there is evidence to support the ideas. It would be more appropriate to say "my hypothesis which some (few) other people share".

A. Are sterilized by the shot

There is zero evidence to support this. There is evidence that it causes substantial spontaneous abortions in the first two trimesters, but that can easily be caused by a shock to the system (which the vaccine causes). It can also be caused by permanent damage to the reproductive organs, but there is zero substantive evidence to support that conclusion.

B. Only have 3 years to live due to the cardio problems

This again has zero evidential support. I am sure it is probably true for some people, but the vaccine causes different damage to different people. Not everyone is susceptible to heart damage to the spike protein and/or inflammation/autoimmune heart damage the vaccine might cause because of their diet/genetics/state of health/where the vaccine accumulates in the individual is different for everyone, even if patterns emerge (which aren't well known at this time, especially long term).

C. Were dumb enough to get the jab to begin with

I can't argue with this one.

All point toward parentage with such a person isn't only likely impossible now, but simply irresponsible.

This is nothing but fear mongering, and it doesn't even have a lick of evidential support (that I have seen). All evidence that I have seen that would warrant these particular fears I have provided substantial evidence to the contrary. That evidence being ignored because people would rather be fearful than not is not my fault. But I am calling this for what it is. Fear mongering.

3 years ago
1 score