The routers can reveal how the network in that building was configured. They can also keep a history of commands and changes that were done on the physical router.

It would show if there was VLANs or firewalls that were properly or improperly setup to prevent or allow network traffic from coming in or going out from specific internal subnetworks that all the election stuff was allegedly connected to. I think they know the election stuff was connected to the LAN, they just need proof that stuff on that LAN could potentially access the outside world

However, logwise the physical routers alone probably would not have any usable logs as too much time has elapsed - routers don't tend to be setup to store logs (they don't have massive storage space). Logs are usually setup to goto a syslog server and I am unsure if that was also in the scope of the subpoena.

The other stuff they had asked for in the subpoena like splunk logs and etc I can't speak on.

The routers can reveal how the network in that building was configured. They can also keep a history of commands and changes that were done on the physical router.

It would show it there was VLANs or firewalls that were properly or improperly setup to prevent or allow network traffic from coming in or going out from specific internal subnetworks that all the election stuff was allegedly connected to. I think they know the election stuff was connected to the LAN, they just need proof that stuff on that LAN could potentially access the outside world

However logwise , the physical routers alone probably would not have any usable logs as too much time has elapsed - routers don't tend to be setup to store logs (they don't have massive storage space). Logs are usually setup to goto a syslog server and I am unsure if that was also in the scope of the subpoena.

The other stuff they had asked for in the subpoena like splunk logs and etc I can't speak on.