So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. They have loopholes put in, I think by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.), that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country, or perhaps I should say, a new Government (which means a new Constitution). There is no other way.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

You are here. ^

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. They have loopholes put in, I think, by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.) that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country, or perhaps I should say, a new Government (which means a new Constitution). There is no other way.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

You are here. ^

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. They have loopholes put in, I think, by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.) that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country, or perhaps I should say, a new Government (which means a new Constitution). There is no other way.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

You are here. ^

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. It was loopholes put in, I think, by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.) that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country, or perhaps I should say, a new Government (which means a new Constitution). There is no other way.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

You are here. ^

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. It was loopholes put in, I think, by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.) that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country, or perhaps I should say, a new Government (which means a new Constitution). There is no other way.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

You are here.

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. It was loopholes put in, I think, by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.) that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country. Or perhaps I should say, a new Government (which means a new Constitution). There is no other way.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

You are here.

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. It was loopholes put in, I think, by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.) that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country. Or perhaps I should say, a new Government (which means a new Constitution). There is no other way.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.

When we started our government, all our federal laws fit on one piece of paper.

Now, almost 250 years later, we have so many laws, no one knows how many there are. It could be trillions. That was all done to con the American people out of their sovereign and inalienable rights.

It worked.

The path back is not more laws, but fewer. Even the Constitution and DoI were inherently flawed. It was loopholes put in, I think, by Banker influences (Hamilton e.g.) that allowed for future fuckery.

We need a new country. There is no other way.

So who has the actual and authentic version?

If this isn't it, then I doubt there is one.

Do you consider the existence of the Quantum Financial System in your assessment?

Its been a while since I dug into the QFS, but I don't remember seeing anything of merit in there outside of some obvious things that have to be part of any solution.

HOW we arrive at a solution is just as important as the solution itself. That is really what these statements here are about. I suggest that we should not be making laws when removing laws and exposing fraud will do the same trick, in a far more permanent way. One path is business as usual, where in this particular case it also makes a clear and legal path to a different totalitarian regime. The other path teaches everyone why we would want to go in a certain direction, while also returning previous restrictions on government, and giving back the power and sovereignty to We The People.