Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Why don't you do some research? Find out for yourself, rather than leaving it a mystery

If you know something, or have evidence to support your claims, then present the evidence. I have done so much research its ridiculous. You have made a claim that I am incorrect. You are attempting to support your claim by telling me that I have not done research. That is not evidence, but a fallacy of argument (and in this case also a non-truth). If you would like to support your claim, it is incumbent upon you to present evidence. I assert I am correct until such evidence is presented and can be debated.

That's what it was. Nothing more, nothing less.

False. It was ALSO a declaration of sovereignty of citizens. If YOU would like to do some research, you should look to John Locke, who was the primary philosophical inspiration for both documents where, with the exception of the two places I have pointed out, sovereignty of citizens was clearly stated. That is why those two points are so important, because they deviate so clearly from the idea of sovereignty.

I think its important that you look more at the fifth amendment than the DoI. I tried to make that clear, but perhaps I did not. The DoI does not make a statement of "not sovereign." it leaves the door open for future fuckery by not making an explicit statement of property ownership, where full ownership rights only belong to a sovereign. It is within the fifth amendment that the real fuckery happens, where it states clearly that citizens are not sovereign, but vassals to the sovereign government.

Everything that comes after that must be understood within the context of the first sentence.

Declaring sovereignty IS in the same context. How could you possibly see it as otherwise?

The reason that things have gone off the rails is not because a different word or phrase would have prohibited tyrants from doing what tyrants do. It has gone off the rails because tyrants have done what they do, no matter what the language says.

True, all the way up until the end. Then, totally and completely wrong.

Whatever else they do illegally, the Luciferians do everything they can to use loopholes in the wording to do their evil. If you look at laws, every law is strictly defined by the words used. If you want to find their fuckery, look at the way they use words. Words are EVERYTHING to them.

For example, what is the Federal Reserve Bank? It is not Federal, it holds nothing in Reserve, and its not a Bank.

It's called the Federal Reserve Bank to Own the world by being exactly the opposite of what it says it is, and it pulls it all off because words matter. None of the masses understand that the Fed is not Federal at all, but a privately owned legal monopoly of the worlds economy. And how did it become a legal monopoly? By more word fuckery. How did the IRS become the tax arm of the Fed? By more word fuckery. It also is not a part of the government, nor a part of the Treasury, except as a legal agent of that institution. And how does it pull off that con? Because words fucking matter.

Words are spells. You cast spells by using words. You use specific words in a specific order with specific definitions and you create the entire world. That is how our system of laws is defined, and how the entirety of the structure of world is defined and runs.

Once you get to any other code of law other than Natural Law, words are everything. Definitions are everything. The choice of words are everything. Words are the world.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Why don't you do some research? Find out for yourself, rather than leaving it a mystery

If you know something, or have evidence to support your claims, then present the evidence. I have done so much research its ridiculous. You have made a claim that I am incorrect. You are attempting to support your claim by telling me that I have not done research. That is not evidence, but a fallacy of argument. If you would like to support your claim, it is incumbent upon you to present evidence. I assert I am correct until such evidence is presented and can be debated.

That's what it was. Nothing more, nothing less.

False. It was ALSO a declaration of sovereignty of citizens. If YOU would like to do some research, you should look to John Locke, who was the primary philosophical inspiration for both documents where, with the exception of the two places I have pointed out, sovereignty of citizens was clearly stated. That is why those two points are so important, because they deviate so clearly from the idea of sovereignty.

I think its important that you look more at the fifth amendment than the DoI. I tried to make that clear, but perhaps I did not. The DoI does not make a statement of "not sovereign." it leaves the door open for future fuckery by not making an explicit statement of property ownership, where full ownership rights only belong to a sovereign. It is within the fifth amendment that the real fuckery happens, where it states clearly that citizens are not sovereign, but vassals to the sovereign government.

Everything that comes after that must be understood within the context of the first sentence.

Declaring sovereignty IS in the same context. How could you possibly see it as otherwise?

The reason that things have gone off the rails is not because a different word or phrase would have prohibited tyrants from doing what tyrants do. It has gone off the rails because tyrants have done what they do, no matter what the language says.

True, all the way up until the end. Then, totally and completely wrong.

Whatever else they do illegally, the Luciferians do everything they can to use loopholes in the wording to do their evil. If you look at laws, every law is strictly defined by the words used. If you want to find their fuckery, look at the way they use words. Words are EVERYTHING to them.

For example, what is the Federal Reserve Bank? It is not Federal, it holds nothing in Reserve, and its not a Bank.

It's called the Federal Reserve Bank to Own the world by being exactly the opposite of what it says it is, and it pulls it all off because words matter. None of the masses understand that the Fed is not Federal at all, but a privately owned legal monopoly of the worlds economy. And how did it become a legal monopoly? By more word fuckery. How did the IRS become the tax arm of the Fed? By more word fuckery. It also is not a part of the government, nor a part of the Treasury, except as a legal agent of that institution. And how does it pull off that con? Because words fucking matter.

Words are spells. You cast spells by using words. You use specific words in a specific order with specific definitions and you create the entire world. That is how our system of laws is defined, and how the entirety of the structure of world is defined and runs.

Once you get to any other code of law other than Natural Law, words are everything. Definitions are everything. The choice of words are everything. Words are the world.

3 years ago
1 score