First, I am allowed to be frustrated with typical responses of "do your own research" when I ask for evidence. Me not finding anything, without any basis of what to look for in a world designed to hide information does not constitute a lack of effort. If people are not here to provide evidence, then what the fuck are people here for? Jerk each other off with confirmation bias and state their investigatory superiority without evidence?

Thousands of comments with hundreds of links have been shared, yet you claim you couldn’t find anything of substance.

Do a search for "Racine" on the community search bar. You get jack and shit for evidence. If I, or someone else asks for evidence, ether ignore them or show the evidence. Don't get pissy with someone for not finding it themselves and asking for help. That does absolutely no one any good and only causes frustration and division within the community.

After you saw the summary and links provided, did you read or look into any of them, or were you too offended by having your motives questioned, so you didn’t bother to look?

I said thank you, I would look into it. Was that sentence too far down in my response for you to read?

Had you not seen any of those comments or links before?

No. I had not seen a single one. I don't read all posts or all comments all day long every day. I have more important things to do, like try to provide evidence to others of the things I have found evidence for.

Were you on Voat?

I was not. I have used it as a reference for other topics. Frankly, I don't find it that useful, though I have not used it as much as I should perhaps.

I prefer primary information sources to random peoples musings, or links to other random peoples musings. For example, I find most of my evidence in Acts of congress or congressional minutes (from congressional archives), .gov documents, Articles of incorporation from the source, public databases (CDC, .gov databases, SEC databases, stock databases, etc.), Scientific Journals, Blacks law dictionary, law.cornell.edu, autobiographies, speeches people give, documents on WEF, UN, WHO, CDC, Rockefeller Foundation etc., etc. websites.

I read primary documents because if you want to convince anyone of anything meaningful you need to show them what people say in their own words. It is what the evil people say in their own words that red-pills the brainwashed. Nothing else works.

So when I ask for evidence, I need evidence that is either primary document evidence, or good resources that link to them, or at the least provide the names of their sources. Everything else is meaningless because it can't be corroborated by primary evidence.

For me it isn't about "finding the truth," because that is unknowable. It is about "showing the evidence that the world is not what it seems to be," because only by waking everyone up can we win this war. Me knowing something is meaningless. Everyone knowing there is more to know is all that matters.

Share what you know about Racine. Do you have decades of direct personal experience with elite circles who are involved in extreme crimes and corruption? Did you go to the highest levels to blow the whistle to the point where Loretta Lynch personally obstructed criminal corruption investigations?

Like seriously, what the fuck are you even talking about here? Are you suggesting that I suggested myself as an expert on Racine and that there was nothing there? I asked for evidence because I couldn't find any.

If you can't just reply with evidence to a request for evidence, there is frankly no reason to reply at all.

First, I am allowed to be frustrated with typical responses of "do your own research" when I ask for evidence. Me not finding anything, without any basis of what to look for in a world designed to hide information does not constitute a lack of effort. If people are not here to provide evidence, then what the fuck are people here for? Jerk each other off with confirmation bias and state their investigatory superiority without evidence?

Thousands of comments with hundreds of links have been shared, yet you claim you couldn’t find anything of substance.

Do a search for "Racine" on the community search bar. You get jack and shit for evidence. If I, or someone else asks for evidence, ether ignore them or show the evidence. Don't get pissy with someone for not finding it themselves and asking for help. That does absolutely no one any good and only causes frustration and division within the community.

After you saw the summary and links provided, did you read or look into any of them, or were you too offended by having your motives questioned, so you didn’t bother to look?

I said thank you, I would look into it. Was that sentence too far down in my response for you to read?

Had you not seen any of those comments or links before?

No. I had not seen a single one. I don't read all posts or all comments all day long every day. I have more important things to do, like try to provide evidence to others of the things I have found evidence for.

Were you on Voat?

I was not. I have used it as a reference for other topics. Frankly, I don't find it that useful, though I have not used it as much as I should perhaps.

I prefer primary information sources to random peoples musings, or links to other random peoples musings. For example, I find most of my evidence in Acts of congress or congressional minutes (from congressional archives), .gov documents, Articles of incorporation from the source, public databases (CDC, .gov databases, SEC databases, stock databases, etc.), Blacks law dictionary, law.cornell.edu, autobiographies, speeches people give, documents on WEF, UN, WHO, CDC, Rockefeller Foundation etc., etc. websites.

I read primary documents because if you want to convince anyone of anything meaningful you need to show them what people say in their own words. It is what the evil people say in their own words that red-pills the brainwashed. Nothing else works.

So when I ask for evidence, I need evidence that is either primary document evidence, or good resources that link to them, or at the least provide the names of their sources. Everything else is meaningless because it can't be corroborated by primary evidence.

For me it isn't about "finding the truth," because that is unknowable. It is about "showing the evidence that the world is not what it seems to be," because only by waking everyone up can we win this war. Me knowing something is meaningless. Everyone knowing there is more to know is all that matters.

Share what you know about Racine. Do you have decades of direct personal experience with elite circles who are involved in extreme crimes and corruption? Did you go to the highest levels to blow the whistle to the point where Loretta Lynch personally obstructed criminal corruption investigations?

Like seriously, what the fuck are you even talking about here? Are you suggesting that I suggested myself as an expert on Racine and that there was nothing there? I asked for evidence because I couldn't find any.

If you can't just reply with evidence to a request for evidence, there is frankly no reason to reply at all.