Reason: None provided.
DJ asks, "lack of what?" which implies lack of evidence. The only thing DJ is proving is that he/she/it has a lack of brains.
No evidence was heard in any court, except for Antrim, Michigan, where the judge ruled that the evidence for election fraud was overwhelming and the case could go forward.
3 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original
DJ asks, "lack of what?" which implies lack of evidence. The only think DJ is proving is that he/she/it has a lack of brains.
No evidence was heard in any court, except for Antrim, Michigan, where the judge ruled that the evidence for election fraud was overwhelming and the case could go forward.
3 years ago
1 score