The Rosenbergs were not acting on behalf of an enemy that used a biological weapon on the US, which is an act of war according to chapter 6.9.

I didn't say the military is currently running the country.

You pointed out that I conflated the term belligerent with enemy combatant. There goes my whole theory!

You seem more interested in pulling things into the weeds instead of a good faith debate about a theory. Are you aware this is a Q forum?

The Rosenbergs were not acting on behalf of an enemy that used a biological weapon on the US, which is an act of war according to chapter 6.9.

I didn't say the military is currently running the country.

You pointed out that I conflated the term belligerent with enemy combatant. There goes my whole theory!

You seem more interested in pulling things into the weeds instead of a good faith debate about theory. Are you aware this is a Q forum?

The Rosenbergs were not acting on behalf of an enemy that used a biological weapon on the US, which is an act of war according to chapter 6.9.

I didn't say the military is currently running the country.

You pointed out that I conflated the term belligerent with enemy combatant. There goes my whole theory!

You seem more interested in pulling things into the weeds instead of a good faith debate a theory. Are you aware this is a Q forum?