Please do fellow patriot - please do. I consider myself an expert on the topic having studied it endlessly these past 2 years. A very good start for you would be to listen to a man by the name of Bill Thornton who extensively documents a case in which he filed a "Court of Record" case many years ago, and essentially tip-toed his way through it, ultimately getting a judge REMOVED who could not comprehend what was going on. A judge who did UNDER-STAND that a Common Law Case was proceeding stepped in, and managed it EXACTLY as he was required to do - as a "justice of the peace", an arbiter only. It's a fascinating case study and proves "how it is done".

Bill handled this case in a most clever and elegant way, making dozens upon dozens of "objections" as the proceeding got underway. His guidance is to simply say "I object" to anything and everything that did not honor the "Common Law" proceeding he had filed (for instance, when a "statutory law" was invoked by the defense attorney. When the initial judge asked WHY he was objecting, Bill stated "Because it is not my wish" ---- Absolutely BRILLIANT!!! As Bill was the KING of HIS COURT and remained "honorable".

Perhaps there is nothing more important than acting HONORABLY any time you appear in court. This is an unspoken "rule" and is held to the highest of esteem by judges (aka "Your Honors"). Far too many people who try this strategy behave belligerently, walking in with a chip on their shoulder, snarling and snapping away. While they may actually be "right" when it comes to "the law and the facts", their approach dooms them --- Every. Single. Time!!! Why? Because they aren't acting HONORABLY, and the judge simply declares "contempt of court" or finds another admiralty/statutory "rule" to impose to shut them down.

There is an unspoken idiom in certain realms - "no law or fact shall be tried in court". Think that through just a bit and you'll get the gist. The supreme MEASURE is ALWAYS in acting HONORABLY. If you can pull it off, you will be respected and treated thusly. You don't need to beg/plead/supplicate or bend-the-knee to the judge. Neither do you need to berate, correct, nor ARGUE with the judge. Openly arguing with a judge (or attorney) while in oral hearings is a dishonorable activity - in every sense of the word. All arguments can and SHOULD be handled in writing anyway.

Perhaps the biggest secret is to never "make a claim" during any oral proceeding or hearing. Instead, you ask questions. For example, "Does such-and-such statute apply in MY CASE judge"? That as opposed to "I object, that statute doesn't hold jurisdiction in my case".

See the difference? You allow the judge to APPEAR as being "in charge" as often as possible, so as not to embarrass him/her while "holding court". This is "acting honorably". You provide your corrections IN WRITING (where you can "make a claim", after the hearing, for the judge's consideration, to every aspect of the case you object to (because it is "Not your wish").

If you think about it carefully, back in the day when Kings/Queens actually "held court", you'll recall they never said to their subjects "Do This, Do that" "I want this done now", etc. They would exclaim; "It is my wish that ________". After which, one of their subjects would then jump to attention to carry out the wish of the king/queen.

The King/Queen are the "Sovereigns", just as the "landed gentry" (Lords, Dukes, Princes, Earls, etc.) back where Common Law was established. All the others were serfs/peons that had no "lawful rights". We find ourselves in the same position as these serfs/peons when we agree we can be addressed as or referred to as any of the following:

• U.S. Citizens
• U S CITIZENS
• Person(s)
• ALL CAPS NAME
• Male/Female (not "man/woman")
• Resident
• Individual
• Human Being
• Mr./Mrs./Miss (Which is the lowest ranking "title" under admiralty law)
• Driver ("Operating a 'Motor Vehicle'")
• Taxpayer
• Litigant
• Affiant
• Plaintiff
• Defendant
• etc.

You are either the sovereign man or woman (The king or the Queen) - minus the "subjects" of course. Nothing else in the above lists.

Nor are you your ALL CAPS NAME - which is referring to your Cestui Que Trust or some different variation IN ALL CAPS which may be referencing a "Special Purposes Vehicle" - e.g. JOHN QUINCY ADAMS vs. JOHN Q. ADAMS or J Q ADAMS, ETC.

Anyway, if you want to learn Bill Thornton's elegant method, which has worked for him many times in the past, you can start watching some of his videos here. If nothing else, I hope you'll find them both informative and entertaining for such otherwise less-than-exciting materials:

Bill Thornton (YT - Eldonthian McAllister channel & The Rule of Law channel) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IuYWR9naPM&t=6366s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkdp1XcLBBw&t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSHj9dE3I5w&t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsEQfDs82Os&t

There is another guy who covers this subject in much more depth, always attempting to simplify. Unfortunately, he's quite rough around the edges, does not suffer fools, and is hard to take for many. However, he is the ultimate expert on this subject IMHO. You can learn a great deal from listening to him. That being said, most of his guidance is for people in positions of defending themselves, rather than plaintiff actions.

Nevertheless, you can learn to be "The king" by understanding what Karl Lentz calls a "lifestyle" adaptation. As he repeats, you either get it or you don't - and carry yourself accordingly (Honorably as the Sovereign {King/Queen}). The Craig Lynch YT channel has saved many hundreds of hours of taped phone calls Karl did 5-8 years ago. It's absolute gold if you can adjust to his demeanor. I recommend listening from the beginning and also the combined sessions when you have time. Here's the channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch/videos

At the end of the day, this "lifestyle" alteration comes down to you recognizing first that we live in an inverted society, in almost every sense. The "Pyramid" has been flipped completely. Man/Woman only falls below God/Creator. All "worldly" activities fall under the simple Maxim of Law: "He Who Creates, Controls"

• God/Creator created man/woman
• Man/Woman created government/Legislatures (and legal society)
• Legislatures created statutes, acts, codes, ordinances, decrees, mandates, executive orders etc. (which only apply to "employees" or "dependents")
• Legislatures also created "U.S. Citizens" with the 14th amendment (Hijacked congress following the Civil War when the south was held captive under martial law), making you a "dependent".
• Legal Society created - "Legal Persons", "Litigants", "Defendants", "Plaintiffs", "Attorneys" etc.

Hopefully as you can see, all the "WORDS" - which were created by legislatures and the legal society place you UNDER THEIR CONTROL - as they "created" these words/ideas. That's why you can't allow/agree/accept any references to such in a lawsuit/case.

Take your rightful position as Man/Woman, and allow no other "titles" (many listed above), and you will proceed accordingly in a Common Law court as the sovereign that you truly are.

Good luck!

Please do fellow patriot - please do. I consider myself an expert on the topic having studied it endlessly these past 2 years. A very good start for you would be to listen to a man by the name of Bill Thornton who extensively documents a case in which he filed a "Court of Record" case many years ago, and essentially tip-toed his way through it, ultimately getting a judge REMOVED who could not comprehend what was going on. A judge who did UNDER-STAND that a Common Law Case was proceeding stepped in, and managed it EXACTLY as he was required to do - as a "justice of the peace", an arbiter only. It's a fascinating case study and proves "how it is done".

Bill handled this case in a most clever and elegant way, making dozens upon dozens of "objections" as the proceeding got underway. His guidance is to simply say "I object" to anything and everything that did not honor the "Common Law" proceeding he had filed (for instance, when a "statutory law" was invoked by the defense attorney. When the initial judge asked WHY he was objecting, Bill stated "Because it is not my wish" ---- Absolutely BRILLIANT!!! As Bill was the KING of HIS COURT and remained "honorable".

Perhaps there is nothing more important than acting HONORABLY any time you appear in court. This is an unspoken "rule" and is held to the highest of esteem by judges (aka "Your Honors"). Far too many people who try this strategy behave belligerently, walking in with a chip on their shoulder, snarling and snapping away. While they may actually be "right" when it comes to "the law and the facts", their approach dooms them --- Every. Single. Time!!! Why? Because they aren't acting HONORABLY, and the judge simply declares "contempt of court" or finds another admiralty/statutory "rule" to impose to shut them down.

There is an unspoken idiom in certain realms - "no law or fact shall be tried in court". Think that through just a bit and you'll get the gist. The supreme MEASURE is ALWAYS in acting HONORABLY. If you can pull it off, you will be respected and treated thusly. You don't need to beg/plead/supplicate or bend-the-knee to the judge. Neither do you need to berate, correct, nor ARGUE with the judge. Openly arguing with a judge (or attorney) while in oral hearings is a dishonorable activity - in every sense of the word. All arguments can and SHOULD be handled in writing anyway.

Perhaps the biggest secret is to never "make a claim" during any oral proceeding or hearing. Instead, you ask questions. For example, "Does such-and-such statute apply in MY CASE judge"? That as opposed to "I object, that statute doesn't hold jurisdiction in my case".

See the difference? You allow the judge to APPEAR as being "in charge" as often as possible, so as not to embarrass him/her while "holding court". This is "acting honorably". You provide your corrections IN WRITING (where you can "make a claim", after the hearing, for the judge's consideration, to every aspect of the case you object to (because it is "Not your wish").

If you think about it carefully, back in the day when Kings/Queens actually "held court", you'll recall they never said to their subjects "Do This, Do that" "I want this done now", etc. They would exclaim; "It is my wish that ________". After which, one of their subjects would then jump to attention to carry out the wish of the king/queen.

The King/Queen are the "Sovereigns", just as the "landed gentry" (Lords, Dukes, Princes, Earls, etc.) back where Common Law was established. All the others were serfs/peons that had no "lawful rights". We find ourselves in the same position as these serfs/peons when we agree we can be addressed as or referred to as any of the following:

• U.S. Citizens
• U S CITIZENS
• Person(s)
• ALL CAPS NAME
• Male/Female (not "man/woman")
• Resident
• Individual
• Human Being
• Mr./Mrs./Miss (Which is the lowest ranking "title" under admiralty law)
• Driver ("Operating a 'Motor Vehicle'")
• Taxpayer
• Litigant
• Affiant
• Plaintiff
• Defendant
• etc.

You are either the sovereign man or woman (The king or the Queen) - minus the "subjects" of course. Nothing else in the above lists.

Nor are you your ALL CAPS NAME - which is referring to your Cestui Que Trust or some different variation IN ALL CAPS which may be referencing a "Special Purposes Vehicle" - e.g. JOHN QUINCY ADAMS vs. JOHN Q. ADAMS or J Q ADAMS, ETC.

Anyway, if you want to learn Bill Thornton's elegant method, which has worked for him many times in the past, you can start watching some of his videos here. If nothing else, I hope you'll find them both informative and entertaining for such otherwise less-than-exciting materials:

Bill Thornton (YT - Eldonthian McAllister channel & The Rule of Law channel) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IuYWR9naPM&t=6366s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fkdp1XcLBBw&t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSHj9dE3I5w&t https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsEQfDs82Os&t

There is another guy who covers this subject in much more depth, always attempting to simplify. Unfortunately, he's quite rough around the edges, does not suffer fools, and is hard to take for many. However, he is the ultimate expert on this subject IMHO. You can learn a great deal from listening to him. That being said, most of his guidance is for people in positions of defending themselves, rather than plaintiff actions.

Nevertheless, you can learn to be "The king" by understanding what Karl Lentz calls a "lifestyle" adaptation. As he repeats, you either get it or you don't - and carry yourself accordingly (Honorably as the Sovereign {King/Queen}). The Craig Lynch YT channel has saved many hundreds of hours of taped phone calls Karl did 5-8 years ago. It's absolute gold if you can adjust to his demeanor. I recommend listening from the beginning and also the combined sessions when you have time. Here's the channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/CraigLynch/videos

At the end of the day, this "lifestyle" alteration comes down to you recognizing first that we live in an inverted society, in almost every sense. The "Pyramid" has been flipped completely. Man/Woman only falls below God/Creator. All "worldly" activities fall under the simple Maxim of Law: "He Who Creates, Controls"

• God/Creator created man/woman
• Man/Woman created government/Legislatures (and legal society)
• Legislatures created statutes, acts, codes, ordinances, decrees, mandates, executive orders etc. (which only apply to "employees" or "dependents")
• Legislatures also created "U.S. Citizens" with the 14th amendment (Hijacked congress following the Civil War when the south was held captive under martial law), making you a "dependent".
• Legal Society created - "Legal Persons", "Litigants", "Defendants", "Plaintiffs", "Attorneys" etc.

Take your rightful position as Man/Woman, and allow no other "titles" (many listed above), and you will proceed accordingly in a Common Law court as the sovereign that you truly are.

Good luck!