There is nothing to explain. I lived in NY (Not NY city). I was working that morning. We had the radio playing a news station. I believe it was WCBS out of NYC.

A female reporter said over the radio that a small plane hit one of the towers. At that moment none of us thought to much about it.

I am pointing out that the reporter was female because of what she said next and how we all looked at each other.

A little while later she reported that another small plane hit the second tower. She wondered if the two planes had anything to do with each other and if it was an attack and not an accident.

The reason it stuck out at me that the reporter was female is because of another story from years before that had nothing to do with 9/11. Yet I connected those two stories and started to question the news since.

The first happened many years before.

Way back when Pope John Paul was shot another female reporter was talking about the Pope in the hospital. The hospital was operating on the Pope and her report ended saying that this is the first time that the Vatican admitted that the Pope had intestines.

At first glance those two stories should have nothing to do with each other. Yet through those two connections my eyes started to open.

I also remember that for weeks after 9/11 there were no pictures or videos of the towers or anything else being hit. I really remember that because I could not believe that with all the cameras all over the place nothing was captured.

Then almost out of nowhere videos of the jets hitting the towers were shown. That is when they showed a slow motion video of the jet hitting the tower. You could see the start of a fire where the jet hit and on the other side of the tower the very beginning of the jet exiting the building before smoke covered everything. At first it did not hit me that there is no way in the world that the jet could keep it's shape going through the building but I remembered the video. or more importantly I remember the bulge coming out of the building that was supposed to be the Jet exiting the building.

As far as I am concerned there is no way in the world that two Jets, two missiles and or two anything else took down those towers. Those towers came down perfectly within their footprint. All three of them.

If that was even possible you would think that the side of the tower that was hit would be the weakest side and would give way before the other side of the tower. Those towers did not fall with one floor after another collapsing. They fell in a free fall just like a controlled demolition.

There where NO Pictures and videos of the jets hitting for weeks later. I know because I was trying to find them to see for myself. There was nothing available.

Of course most people were in shock at the time and everyone was concerned about war. There was no reason to worry about seeing pictures of Jets hitting the towers.

I just wanted to know why the reporter thought they were small planes to start with. How could anybody mix that story up? It didn't occur to me that maybe something else took down the towers.

Q posted this one statement that really stuck out with me when it was posted.

That statement was Think for yourself trust yourself.

https://qposts.online/?q=trust+yourself&s=keyword

I know what I remembered. I also know that people are saying things now about seeing pictures and videos of those Jets hitting to towers right after it happened.

I am going to stick with trusting myself. There were no pictures or videos of anything hitting those towers for weeks afterwards.

Also the first videos that did come out are not the same as the ones we can see now.

I cannot prove this to you. I can only tell you what I experienced. As far as those millions of witnesses. I am not sure what they saw because there was nothing to see at the time

There is nothing to explain. I lived in NY (Not NY city). I was working that morning. We had the radio playing a news station. I believe it was WCBS out of NYC.

A female reporter said over the radio that a small plane hit one of the towers. At that moment none of us thought to much about it.

I am pointing out that the reporter was female because of what she said next and how we all looked at each other.

A little while later she reported that another small plane hit the second tower. She wondered if the two planes had anything to do with each other and if it was an attack and not an accident.

The reason it stuck out at me that the reporter was female is because of another story from years before that had nothing to do with 9/11. Yet I connected those two stories and started to question the news since.

The first happened many years before.

Way back when Pope John Paul was shot another female reporter was talking about the Pope in the hospital. The hospital was operating on the Pope and her report ended saying that this is the first time that the Vatican admitted that the Pope had intestines.

At first glance those two stories should have nothing to do with each other. Yet through those two connections my eyes started to open.

I also remember that for weeks after 9/11 there were no pictures or videos of the towers or anything else being hit. I really remember that because I could not believe that with all the cameras all over the place nothing was captured.

Then almost out of nowhere videos of the jets hitting the towers were shown. That is when they showed a slow motion video of the jet hitting the tower. You could see the start of a fire where the jet hit and on the other side of the tower the very beginning of the jet exiting the building before smoke covered everything. At first it did not hit me that there is no way in the world that the jet could keep it's shape going through the building but I remembered the video. or more importantly I remember the bulge coming out of the building that was supposed to be the Jet exiting the building.

As far as I am concerned there is no way in the world that two Jets, two missiles and or two anything else took down those towers. Those towers came down perfectly within their footprint. All three of them.

If that was even possible you would think that the side of the tower that was hit would be the weakest side and would give way before the other side of the tower. Those towers did not fall with one floor after another collapsing. They fell in a free fall just like a controlled demolishing.

There where NO Pictures and videos of the jets hitting for weeks later. I know because I was trying to find them to see for myself. There was nothing available.

Of course most people were in shock at the time and everyone was concerned about war. There was no reason to worry about seeing pictures of Jets hitting the towers.

I just wanted to know why the reporter thought they were small planes to start with. How could anybody mix that story up? It didn't occur to me that maybe something else took down the towers.

Q posted this one statement that really stuck out with me. drop really stuck out when it was posted.

That statement was Think for yourself trust yourself.

https://qposts.online/?q=trust+yourself&s=keyword

I know what I remembered. I also know that people are saying things now about seeing pictures and videos of those Jets hitting to towers right after it happened.

I am going to stick with trusting myself. There were no pictures or videos of anything hitting those towers for weeks afterwards.

Also the first videos that did come out are not the same as the ones we can see now.

I cannot prove this to you. I can only tell you what I experienced. As far as those millions of witnesses. I am not sure what they saw because there was nothing to see at the time