Worth watching; I will be. If this does not come to pass, it was high effort and worthy of consideration. This will be a point of reference for refining your process.

Without criticism, the most fuzzy area is the gematria; I am skeptical and have low confidence, but not convinced either way. Your work here does not have to assume that gematria is a real historical thing (meaningful or not). It does have to assume that Q is using gematria for comms encryption (so to speak). If Q is/did, then it is real for Q comms purposes and is worth considering.

Edited for comments on gematria.

Worth watching; I will be. If this does not come to pass, it was high effort and worthy of consideration. This will be a point of reference for refining the process.