..and again this is a perfect illustration. The word just has a different meaning to you than the classic meaning.

The truth, in your example, would be better illustrated by a video of the event which the two are recounting.(Do I really have to spell this out?) So if their accounts are both incorrect in certain details, would not the account provided by the camera be true and correct. The truth.

If they are incorrect or have inconsistencies how can their accounts be the truth? They are accidentally incorrect, and so, in some details, not telling the truth. In court, when they say to tell the truth, what do you think they mean?

Cambridge Dictionary:- "the real facts about a situation, event, or person" "the quality of being true" - this is pretty self explanatory.

The definition does not contain "real fact about a situation, event or person including incorrectly remembered facts, innuendo and scuttlebutt."

..and again this is a perfect illustration. The word just has a different meaning to you than the classic meaning.

The truth, in your example, would be better illustrated by a video of the event which the two are recounting.(Do I really have to spell this out?) So if their accounts are both incorrect in certain details, would not the account provided by the camera be true and correct. The truth.

If they are incorrect or have incosistencies how can their accounts be the truth? They are accidentally incorrect, and so, in some details, not telling the truth. In court, when they say to tell the truth, what do you think they mean?

..and again this is a perfect illustration. The word just has a different meaning to you than the classic meaning.

The truth, in your example, would be better illustrated by a video of the event which the two are recounting. So if their accounts are both incorrect in certain details, would not the account provided by the camera be true and correct. The truth.

If they are incorrect or have incosistencies how can their accounts be the truth. They are accidentally incorrect, and so, in some details, not the truth. In court, when they say to tell the truth, what do you think they mean?

..and again this is a perfect illustration. The word just has a different meaning to you than the classic meaning.

The truth, in your example, would be better illustrated by a video of the event which the two are recounting. So if their accounts are both incorrect in certain details, what do you call the account provided by the camera?

If they are incorrect or have incosistencies how can the accounts be the truth. In court, when they say to tell the truth, what do you think they mean?