This sounds like a fear pushing article for views. Anyone care to chime in? We need to look closely as medical data can be twisted to suit narratives.

As some commentators have pointed out, the conclusion of this article is very weakly (if at all) supported by the raw data. For one thing, the authors are working solely off infection rates, comparing between vaxed and unvaxed, and infection (based, presumably on a positive covid test) does not demonstrate a failing immune system. For another, the other metrics of emergency care admittance and death numbers clearly show that the vaxed are protected (very significantly) against serious adverse outcomes.

I have had some respect for this website in the past, but am now questioning its credibility.

Perhaps, in the future, we will know of the immune depleting effects of the vax. But this article does not support that conclusion at all (and the more it is cited, i fear, the more vax-cautious folks will be regarded as kooks-with good reason.)

This sounds like a fear pushing article for views. Anyone care to chime in? We need to look closely as medical data can be twisted to suit narratives.

As some commentators have pointed out, the conclusion of this article is very weakly (if at all) supported by the raw data. For one thing, the authors are working solely off infection rates, comparing between vaxed and unvaxed, and infection (based, presumably on a positive covid test) does not demonstrate a failing immune system. For another, the other metrics of emergency care admittance and death numbers clearly show that the vaxed are protected (very significantly) against serious adverse outcomes.

I have had some respect for this website in the past, but am now questioning its credibility.

Perhaps, in the future, we will know of the immune depleting effects of the vax. But this article does not support that conclusion at all (and the more it is cited, i fear, the more vax-cautious folks will be regarded as kooks-with good reason.)

This sounds like a fear pushing article for views. Anyone care to chime in? We need to look closely as medical data can be twisted to suit narratives.

As some commentators have pointed out, the conclusion of this article is very weakly (if at all) supported by the raw data. For one thing, the authors are working solely off infection rates, comparing between vaxed and unvaxed, and infection (based, presumably on a positive covid test) does not demonstrate a failing immune system. For another, the other metrics of emergency care admittance and death numbers clearly show that the vaxed are protected (very significantly) against serious adverse outcomes.

I have had some respect for this website in the past, but am now questioning its credibility.

Perhaps, in the future, we will know of the immune depleting effects of the vax. But this article does not support that conclusion at all (and the more it is cited, i fear, the more vax-cautious folks will be regarded as kooks-with good reason.)

I would take this study with a grain of salt. Anyone care to chime in on this comment?

As some commentators have pointed out, the conclusion of this article is very weakly (if at all) supported by the raw data. For one thing, the authors are working solely off infection rates, comparing between vaxed and unvaxed, and infection (based, presumably on a positive covid test) does not demonstrate a failing immune system. For another, the other metrics of emergency care admittance and death numbers clearly show that the vaxed are protected (very significantly) against serious adverse outcomes.

I have had some respect for this website in the past, but am now questioning its credibility.

Perhaps, in the future, we will know of the immune depleting effects of the vax. But this article does not support that conclusion at all (and the more it is cited, i fear, the more vax-cautious folks will be regarded as kooks-with good reason.)