I call bullshit on this claim.

What is the difference between a person who refused the jab, gets fired, and someone was forced to take the jab in order to feed their family.

I would think that hospitals will still be staffed with many who are very bitter that they were forced to decide between a jab, which they strongly opposed, and their feeding their family. These people forced to take jab maybe eager for revenge, and will spill the beans. There will also be people who reveal truth out of a sense of what's right, and what's wrong.

Turning a blind eye to injustice is more responsible for it's existence, than is ignorance that it exist.

Do you really believe that Roosevelt and Churchill did not know anything about extermination camps until the liberation of these camps in 1945?

I call bullshit on this claim.

What is the difference between a person who refused the jab, gets fired, and someone was forced to take the jab in order to feed their family.

I would think that hospitals will still be staffed with many who are very bitter that they were forced to decide between a jab, which they strongly opposed, and their feeding their family. These people forced to take jab are eager from revenge, and will spill the beans. There will also be people who reveal truth out of a sense of what's right, and what's wrong.

Turning a blind eye to injustice is more responsible for it's existence, than is ignorance of that it exist.

Do you really believe that Roosevelt and Churchill did not know anything about extermination camps until the liberation of these camps in 1945?