But that would clearly allow for competing groups to function as protectors of your rights or mine

That's exactly how the United States was set up. The States are the competing groups. The Federal government was only designed to ensure that the states didn't violate the social contract (constitution) with their "competing" laws.

I still insist that it ONLY was able to outgrow its original design because of the lack of explicit statement of citizen sovereignty. Of course it may have happened regardless, the bankers (lead by the Rothschilds) owned enough of the world by the early 1800's that they had substantial pressure to make anything they want happen. So by hook or by crook, it probably would have happened even with citizen sovereignty being clear, though it would have been a lot more difficult. We might even still be in that battle instead of having lost it over 100 years ago. Maybe the GA would have happened sooner...

The only reason what has happened was possible was not the construction of the government, or any inherent flaws, but because of the construction of The Matrix; the purposeful overlay of competing belief systems on Reality that are the construction of the PTB.

The Matrix is designed to hide the truth by using the beliefs of the population to do the work for it. It is a self adjusting system requiring only top level control. That is how what has happened has happened. That is what the GA is all about, waking up to the Matrix.

Whatever form of government we get from here will almost certainly include explicit statements of sovereignty. A recognition of the value of the individual life (and the rights inherent in that life), the self realization of the value in our own lives, is among the most important parts of the GA. I don't think we've gotten there quite yet, but we are closing in on that realization.

For that to work well there would need to be legal agreements between the "governments" (really insurance & security agencies) and each agency would need to include clauses in their membership agreements specifying rules involved in dispute resolution when the other party was subscribed to a different agency.

That is precisely the original design of our government. The States are the competing governments, the Federal government is the agent that checks those governments, insuring they don't violate the social contract (and nothing more except to organize the common defense and set a standard for measures (like money)).

ANY source of monopoly power ... is an extreme danger that will become corrupted.

I agree with this sentiment, I just don't see a federal social contract as a monopoly. Not to say our current Federal government isn't, of course it is, but it didn't start out that way, and I have explained why it became what it did. It is a lesson learned, if we grok it.

But that would clearly allow for competing groups to function as protectors of your rights or mine

That's exactly how the United States was set up. The States are the competing groups. The Federal government was only designed to ensure that the states didn't violate the social contract (constitution) with their "competing" laws.

I still insist that it ONLY was able to outgrow its original design because of the lack of explicit statement of citizen sovereignty. Of course it may have happened regardless, the bankers (lead by the Rothschilds) owned enough of the world by the early 1800's that they had substantial pressure to make anything they want happen. So by hook or by crook, it probably would have happened even with citizen sovereignty being clear, though it would have been a lot more difficult. We might even still be in that battle instead of having lost it over 100 years ago. Maybe the GA would have happened sooner...

The only reason what has happened was possible was not the construction of the government, or any inherent flaws, but because of the construction of The Matrix; the purposeful overlay of competing belief systems on Reality that are the construction of the PTB.

The Matrix is designed to hide the truth by using the beliefs of the population to do the work for it. It is a self adjusting system requiring only top level control. That is how what has happened has happened. That is what the GA is all about, waking up to the Matrix.

Whatever form of government we get from here will almost certainly include explicit statements of sovereignty. A recognition of the value of the individual life (and the rights inherent in that life), the self realization of the value in our own lives, is among the most important parts of the GA. I don't think we've gotten there quite yet, but we are closing in on that realization.

For that to work well there would need to be legal agreements between the "governments" (really insurance & security agencies) and each agency would need to include clauses in their membership agreements specifying rules involved in dispute resolution when the other party was subscribed to a different agency.

That is precisely the original design of our government. The States are the competing governments, the Federal government is the agent that checks those governments, insuring they don't violate the social contract (and nothing more except to organize the common defense).

ANY source of monopoly power ... is an extreme danger that will become corrupted.

I agree with this sentiment, I just don't see a federal social contract as a monopoly. Not to say our current Federal government isn't, of course it is, but it didn't start out that way, and I have explained why it became what it did. It is a lesson learned, if we grok it.

But that would clearly allow for competing groups to function as protectors of your rights or mine

That's exactly how the United States was set up. The States are the competing groups. The Federal government was only designed to ensure that the states didn't violate the social contract (constitution) with their "competing" laws.

I still insist that it ONLY was able to outgrow its original design because of the lack of explicit statement of citizen sovereignty. Of course it may have happened regardless, the bankers (lead by the Rothschilds) owned enough of the world by the early 1800's that they had substantial pressure to make anything they want happen. So by hook or by crook, it probably would have happened even with citizen sovereignty being clear, though it would have been a lot more difficult. We might even still be in that battle instead of having lost it over 100 years ago. Maybe the GA would have happened sooner...

The only reason what has happened was possible was not the construction of the government, or any inherent flaws, but because of the construction of The Matrix; the purposeful overlay of competing belief systems on Reality that are the construction of the PTB.

The Matrix is designed to hide the truth by using the beliefs of the population to do the work for it. It is a self adjusting system requiring only top level control. That is how what has happened has happened. That is what the GA is all about, waking up to the Matrix.

Whatever form of government we get from here will almost certainly include explicit statements of sovereignty. A recognition of the value of the individual life (and the rights inherent in that life), the self realization of the value in our own lives, is among the most important part of the GA. I don't think we've gotten there quite yet, but we are closing in on that realization.

For that to work well there would need to be legal agreements between the "governments" (really insurance & security agencies) and each agency would need to include clauses in their membership agreements specifying rules involved in dispute resolution when the other party was subscribed to a different agency.

That is precisely the original design of our government. The States are the competing governments, the Federal government is the agent that checks those governments, insuring they don't violate the social contract (and nothing more except to organize the common defense).

ANY source of monopoly power ... is an extreme danger that will become corrupted.

I agree with this sentiment, I just don't see a federal social contract as a monopoly. Not to say our current Federal government isn't, of course it is, but it didn't start out that way, and I have explained why it became what it did. It is a lesson learned, if we grok it.

But that would clearly allow for competing groups to function as protectors of your rights or mine

That's exactly how the United States was set up. The States are the competing groups. The Federal government was only designed to ensure that the states didn't violate the social contract (constitution) with their "competing" laws.

I still insist that it ONLY was able to outgrow its original design because of the lack of explicit statement of citizen sovereignty. Of course it may have happened regardless, the bankers (lead by the Rothschilds) owned enough of the world by the early 1800's that they had substantial pressure to make anything they want happen. So by hook or by crook, it probably would have happened even with citizen sovereignty being clear, though it would have been a lot more difficult. We might even still be in that battle instead of having lost it over 100 years ago. Maybe the GA would have happened sooner...

The only reason what has happened was possible was not the construction of the government, or any inherent flaws, but because of the construction of The Matrix; the purposeful overlay of competing belief systems on Reality that are the construction of the PTB.

The Matrix is designed to hide the truth by using the beliefs of the population to do the work for it. It is a self adjusting system requiring only top level control. That is how what has happened has happened. That is what the GA is all about, waking up to the Matrix.

Whatever form of government we get from here will almost certainly include explicit statements of sovereignty. A recognition of the value of the individual life (and the rights inherent in that life) is among the most important part of the GA. I don't think we've gotten there quite yet, but we are closing in on that realization.

For that to work well there would need to be legal agreements between the "governments" (really insurance & security agencies) and each agency would need to include clauses in their membership agreements specifying rules involved in dispute resolution when the other party was subscribed to a different agency.

That is precisely the original design of our government. The States are the competing governments, the Federal government is the agent that checks those governments, insuring they don't violate the social contract (and nothing more except to organize the common defense).

ANY source of monopoly power ... is an extreme danger that will become corrupted.

I agree with this sentiment, I just don't see a federal social contract as a monopoly. Not to say our current Federal government isn't, of course it is, but it didn't start out that way, and I have explained why it became what it did. It is a lesson learned, if we grok it.

But that would clearly allow for competing groups to function as protectors of your rights or mine

That's exactly how the United States was set up. The States are the competing groups. The Federal government was only designed to ensure that the states didn't violate the social contract (constitution) with their "competing" laws.

I still insist that it ONLY was able to outgrow its original design because of the lack of explicit statement of citizen sovereignty. Of course it may have happened regardless, the bankers (lead by the Rothschilds) owned enough of the world by the early 1800's that they had substantial pressure to make anything they want happen. So by hook or by crook, it probably would have happened even with citizen sovereignty being clear, though it would have been a lot more difficult. We might even still be in that battle instead of having lost it over 100 years ago. Maybe the GA would have happened sooner...

The only reason what has happened was possible was not the construction of the government, or any inherent flaws, but because of the construction of The Matrix; the purposeful overlay of competing belief systems on Reality that are the construction of the PTB.

The Matrix is designed to hide the truth, by using the beliefs of the population to do the work for it. It is a self adjusting system, requiring only top level control. That is how what has happened has happened. That is what the GA is all about, waking up to the Matrix.

Whatever form of government we get from here will almost certainly include explicit statements of sovereignty. A recognition of the value of the individual life (and the rights inherent in that life) is among the most important part of the GA. I don't think we've gotten there quite yet, but we are closing in on that realization.

For that to work well there would need to be legal agreements between the "governments" (really insurance & security agencies) and each agency would need to include clauses in their membership agreements specifying rules involved in dispute resolution when the other party was subscribed to a different agency.

That is precisely the original design of our government. The States are the competing governments, the Federal government is the agent that checks those governments, insuring they don't violate the social contract (and nothing more except to organize the common defense).

ANY source of monopoly power ... is an extreme danger that will become corrupted.

I agree with this sentiment, I just don't see a federal social contract as a monopoly. Not to say our current Federal government isn't, of course it is, but it didn't start out that way, and I have explained why it became what it did. It is a lesson learned, if we grok it.