Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

YOU ARE WRONG. Are you a paid leftist or a paid centrist?

Read the numbers in the study and do the math , my numbers came from the study. All followup studies you will try to cite will exclude 1st trimester. They played slippery with the data but its in that paper I gave link to.

The calculation is based on subtracting the later trimesters from that paper and the resulting trimester, the first, then contained both a N-count and a failure count, allowing a calculation to be made by omitting irrelevant trimesters that are even less likely to miscarry.

Also all births are down 5% this month over last year! Gee i wonder why?!?!?

Show me a refuting paper. The shot-clot does most damage to t-cells in the weeks after the second shot tapering off over the next few months, allegedly.

82% of the miscarriages were in the first trimester, the actual rate of miscarriages is low to begin with, the shot clot merely takes the small number of typical 1st trimester failures and magnifies it astoundingly.

YOU ARE WRONG. Are you a paid leftist or centrist? Look at your comments from today:

Child molesting/trafficking is one of the few things that even most leftists detest

then I read the posts from people ACTUALLY IN JAPAN, who find this likely totally untrue, and the source of this "news" is Hal Turner

To play devil's advocate (which, any response that could be considered a defense of Democrats would be :) ), they could say they ordered extras for the next election?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

YOU ARE WRONG. Are you a paid leftist?

Read the numbers in the study and do the math , my numbers came from the study. All followup studies you will try to cite will exclude 1st trimester. They played slippery with the data but its in that paper I gave link to.

The calculation is based on subtracting the later trimesters from that paper and the resulting trimester, the first, then contained both a N-count and a failure count, allowing a calculation to be made by omitting irrelevant trimesters that are even less likely to miscarry.

Also all births are down 5% this month over last year! Gee i wonder why?!?!?

Show me a refuting paper. The shot-clot does most damage to t-cells in the weeks after the second shot tapering off over the next few months, allegedly.

82% of the miscarriages were in the first trimester, the actual rate of miscarriages is low to begin with, the shot clot merely takes the small number of typical 1st trimester failures and magnifies it astoundingly.

YOU ARE WRONG. Are you a paid leftist or centrist? Look at your comments from today:

Child molesting/trafficking is one of the few things that even most leftists detest

then I read the posts from people ACTUALLY IN JAPAN, who find this likely totally untrue, and the source of this "news" is Hal Turner

To play devil's advocate (which, any response that could be considered a defense of Democrats would be :) ), they could say they ordered extras for the next election?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

YOU ARE WRONG.

Read the numbers in the study and do the math , my numbers came from the study. All followup studies you will try to cite will exclude 1st trimester. They played slippery with the data but its in that paper I gave link to.

The calculation is based on subtracting the later trimesters from that paper and the resulting trimester, the first, then contained both a N-count and a failure count, allowing a calculation to be made by omitting irrelevant trimesters that are even less likely to miscarry.

Also all births are down 5% this month over last year! Gee i wonder why?!?!?

Show me a refuting paper. The shot-clot does most damage to t-cells in the weeks after the second shot tapering off over the next few months, allegedly.

82% of the miscarriages were in the first trimester, the actual rate of miscarriages is low to begin with, the shot clot merely takes the small number of typical 1st trimester failures and magnifies it astoundingly.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

YOU ARE WRONG.

Read the numbers in the study and do the math , my numbers came from the study. All followup studies you will try to cite will exclude 1st trimester. They played slippery with the databut its in that paper I gave link to. Also all births are down 7% this month over last year.

Show me a refuting paper. The shot-clot does most damage to t-cells in the weeks after the second shot tapering off over the next few months, allegedly.

82% of the miscarriages were in the first trimester, the actual rate of miscarriages is low to begin with, the shot clot merely takes the small number of typical 1st trimester failures and magnifies it astoundingly.

3 years ago
1 score