Yes and no.

It's cruel to "feed the starving" people of nations who can't support their own population because that creates an entire welfare country and the more you spoon food into their mouths, the more starving babies they will shit out.

The kinder option is to allow a starving population to dwindle until it is capable of self reliance, even if that means a return to an illiterate, cannibalistic, nomadic culture of living in mud huts and caves.

Yes and no.

It's cruel to "feed the starving" people of nations who can't support their own population because that creates an entire welfare country and the more you spoon food into their mouths, the more starving babies they will shit out.

The kinder option is to allow a starving population to dwindle until it is capable of self reliance, even if that means a return to an illiterate, nomadic culture of living in mud huts and caves.

Yes and no.

It's cruel to "feed the starving" people of nations who can't support their own population because that creates an entire welfare country and the more you spoon food into their mouths, the more starving babies they will shit out.

The kinder option is to allow a starving population to dwindle until it is capable of self reliance, even if that means a return to living in caves and mud huts.