This is not about 'vaxxines', that is actually a genetic modification experimental injection, but safeguarding religious beliefs, which fall under the 1965 Civil Rights Act, Title VII. It doesn't matter what the case is. Religious beliefs are to be secured and safeguarded.

If pork was mandated to Muslims and Jews, would those who don't like eating pork and cave continue fighting for those whose religious beliefs forbids them?

It's irrelevant and not divisive nor discriminatory.

The Civil Rights Act provides for religious beliefs to be safeguarded and secured in all public accommodations including businesses. A religious exemption is not a request, but is a LAW of land for over 55 years.

This is not about 'vaxxines', that is actually a genetic modification experimental injection, but safeguarding religious beliefs, which fall under the 1965 Civil Rights Act, Title VII. It doesn't matter what the case is. Religious beliefs are to be secured and safeguarded.

If pork was mandated to Muslims and Jews would those who don't like eating pork and cave continue fighting for those whose religious beliefs forbids them?

It's irrelevant and not divisive nor discriminatory.

The Civil Rights Act provides for religious beliefs to be safeguarded and secured in all public accommodations including businesses. A religious exemption is not a request, but is a LAW of land for over 55 years.

This is not about 'vaxxines', that is actually a genetic modification experimental injection, and religious beliefs fall under the 1965 Civil Rights Act, Title VII.

If pork was mandated to Muslims and Jews would those who don't like eating pork and cave continue fighting for those whose religious beliefs forbids them?

It's irrelevant and not divisive nor discriminatory.

The Civil Rights Act provides for religious beliefs to be safeguarded and secured in all public accommodations including businesses. A religious exemption is not a request, but is a LAW of land for over 55 years.