This article glows. Not only because the author is a Pulitzer winner.

He talks about how Syed Fahad Hashmi must be completely innocent because all he did was house a guy conspiring to send aid to Al-Qaeda. We now know that Saudi Arabia did a similar thing with the 9/11 bombers due to what was declassified this past September. They paid for the 9/11 hijackers and planners’ apartments.

Furthermore, if Assange is already contemplating suicide in the UK hundreds of times a day, I don’t buy the argument to not extradite him because “he’ll be suicidal in US prisons.” The claim he didn’t show up the second day because he’s “on a lot of medication” is concerning to say the least.

Plus we have this from 1708: “ What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia? Crowdstrike? Servers. SR. JA. Why does the UK gov desperately want JA? Think source files. The more you know. Q”

I keep leaning toward the conclusion that they don’t want him extradited; he’d be theoretically safe in WH hands, leaving the UK screwed without him. I sometimes wonder if Assange arriving by plane on US soil would be what forces the military to take control, because they know he can’t fall into BH hands. If they have the source files, they can expose it all.

Full tin foil makes me think Assange’s wife is his handler, as she ~happened to know the languages necessary when his legal team was in crunch time for charges against him.~

Not saying the claims that they’re trying to completely destroy the future of whistleblowing are invalid, just that this article reads like someone wrote it with not-so-honest intentions.

This article glows. Not only because the author is a Pulitzer winner.

He talks about how Syed Fahad Hashmi must be completely innocent because all he did was house a guy conspiring to send aid to Al-Qaeda. We now know that Saudi Arabia did a similar thing with the 9/11 bombers due to what was declassified this past September. They paid for the 9/11 hijackers and planners’ apartments.

Furthermore, if Assange is already contemplating suicide in the UK hundreds of times a day, I don’t buy the argument to not extradite him because “he’ll be suicidal in US prisons.”

Plus we have this from 1708: “ What if intel masked penetration(s) to frame Russia? Crowdstrike? Servers. SR. JA. Why does the UK gov desperately want JA? Think source files. The more you know. Q”

I keep wondering if they don’t want him extradited because then he’s safe in WH hands, leaving the UK screwed without him.

Not saying the claims that they’re trying to completely destroy the future of whistleblowing are invalid, just that this article reads like someone wrote it with not-so-honest intentions.