She definitely said “We’re also set to hear from the occupant of this house, the White House” (while a pic of the WH is on the screen). She goes on to definitely say, “Former President Biden is set to speak . . . “ But I don’t think it was intentional. I’d tend to agree with Patriot_Perks that she maybe just was used to referring to him as “former Vice President Biden” and it was a slip of the tongue. He really can’t be a “former” President when he’s not a legit President, so in that context, what would it prove by her saying it? There’s plenty of more obvious stuff going for us to need him being referred to as “former” to be what proves it’s habbening. NCSWIC

She definitely said “We’re also set to hear from the occupant of this house, the White House” (while a pic of the WH is on the screen). She goes on to definitely say, “Former President Biden is set to speak . . . “