Santiago and Buenos Aires are the same difference. Neither city connects with Perth, where the flight WOULD have to go over land. Look at the flight map routes and how they loop south for no apparent reason. Why not a straight line? It's because they're arcing around North America (Mexico especially).

The flight time dilemma has been explained many times in that the actual height and speed of the plane are not being honestly or accurately reported. There are allegedly winds that can be caught at higher and higher altitudes that shorten the time it takes to make that trip.

Anyway, that's some pretty esoteric stuff that can't be confirmed one way or the other.

There was an arrogant pilot that offered to fly these routes if the flat earth contingent would come up with about $25K to pay for the flight. He put his offer out on YouTube attempting to end the debate. The only problem was, he didn't expect the flat-earthers to whip the cash together and take him up on his offer. The arrogant pilot privately rescinded his offer shortly thereafter.

All this to say, the burden of proof is really on the globers who make the claims that they do. Unfortunately for them, they can't prove their claims, because they're all based on theories (gravity, big bang, special relativity, general relativity, and on and on). The flat earth side of the equation doesn't have the answers for everything as we don't have a $53 Million dollar a day budget like NASA. We could answer a lot more questions if we had those kinds of funds (stolen from the American people I might add).

Maxim of Law: He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof. Sadly, we can't find any proof of the globe outside of NASA lies and mathematical equations based on faulty assumptions.

Why would you give THEM the benefit of the doubt? If you're here on GA, your trust in all things government and authoritative must be at an all time low. Don't you think it's possible they're deceiving us about this too?

I guess what I'm trying to say is, one obscure flight route hardly tips the scales. Did you watch the video about the other 10 flight routes and why they fly the way they do? No comment on those?

Ask yourself this: Why are there many hundred flight routes that start and end in the northern hemisphere that NEVER connect to a city in the southern hemisphere? But on the flip side, there are hundreds of southern flight routes, the majority of which that go between continents have connections in the northern hemisphere.

The globers answer to that is; "More people live in the northern hemisphere so there's more money in it for the airlines to have layovers there".

That's the official explanation for this anomaly, which completely ignores the time, expense, fuel costs and wear and tear on the plane to fly these extra thousands of miles into and out of the northern hemisphere instead of simply flying the shortest distance between two points with their southern hemisphere passengers.

Do you buy it?

Santiago and Buenos Aires are the same difference. Neither city connects with Perth, where the flight WOULD have to go over land. Look at the flight map routes and how they loop south for no apparent reason. Why not a straight line? It's because they're arcing around North America (Mexico especially).

The flight time dilemma has been explained many times in that the actual height and speed of the plane are not being honestly or accurately reported. There are allegedly winds that can be caught at higher and higher altitudes that shorten the time it takes to make that trip.

Anyway, that's some pretty esoteric stuff that can't be confirmed one way or the other.

There was an arrogant pilot that offered to fly these routes if the flat earth contingent would come up with about $25K to pay for the flight. He put his offer out on YouTube attempting to end the debate. The only problem was, he didn't expect the flat-earthers to whip the cash together and take him up on his offer. The arrogant pilot privately rescinded his offer shortly thereafter.

All this to say, the burden of proof is really on the globers who make the claims that they do. Unfortunately for them, they can't prove their claims, because they're all based on theories (gravity, big bang, special relativity, general relativity, and on and on). The flat earth side of the equation doesn't have the answers for everything as we don't have a $53 Million dollar a day budget like NASA. We could answer a lot more questions if we had those kinds of funds (stolen from the American people I might add).

Maxim of Law: He who makes the claim bears the burden of proof. Sadly, we can't find any proof of the globe outside of NASA lies and mathematical equations based on faulty assumptions.

Why would you give THEM the benefit of the doubt? If you're here on GA, your trust in all things government and authoritative must be at an all time low. Don't you think it's possible they're deceiving us about this too?

I guess what I'm trying to say is, one obscure flight route hardly tips the scales. Did you watch the video about the other 10 flight routes and why they fly the way they do? No comment on those?

Ask yourself this: Why are there many hundred flight routes that start and end in the northern hemisphere that NEVER connect to a city in the southern hemisphere? But on the flip side, there are hundreds of southern flight routes, the majority of which that go between continents have connections in the northern hemisphere.

The globers answer to that is; "More people live in the northern hemisphere so there's more money in it for the airlines to have layovers there".

That's the official explanation for this anomaly. Do you buy it?