Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Shortly thereafter, the private corporations known as "the United States of America (Inc) {Crown} and "UNITED STATES (Inc) {Vatican - municipal}

Do you have evidence that supports this? I can't find this anywhere, and I have looked. I could not find evidence in the Organic Act of 1871 that supports this. All that seems to do is create a municipal corp for D.C., which is owned(?) by the United States Government. I'm not sure if the United States government that owns D.C. is the same government that was incorporated by the Constitution (it incorporated the sovereign entity (governing body) we call the U.S. of A) or if it is some other United States government created after (for which I can't find documentation). The CEO for that corp is The President, the Congress is the ruling body, etc. It seems to be an independent city state, since it is technically (legally) foreign to all states.

So it is technically a foreign corporation, but that's not as damning as it sounds because each State is a foreign corporation to every other state. D.C. is a foreign (municipal) corporation to all of them. So it is, just like the Vatican and London, an independent City State.

But linking that to the Crown, or the Vatican by any measure I just have not been able to do. I can't find any connection of ownership or allegiance in any law, or financial record, or treaty, etc. That doesn't mean it isn't there, even where I have looked. It can get confusing, and seeing the essential pieces takes intense concentration on otherwise dry documents, but I have looked quite a bit and i can't find this connection (in a real document).

If you have that evidence, or have any idea where to find it, that would be absolutely huge for my report.

D.C. could be owned through municipal bonds. I have tried to find bond ownership for D.C. bonds but I can't find any documentation. I can only find that they exist.

I did find documentation that shows that the Queen has control over the Social Security Fund. Not a huge corroboration, but a decent red-pill.

Actually, if you have any primary sources (or solid secondary sources with primary references) for some of the other statements you have made, that would be absolutely awesome. Specifically, the creation of the Capitalized LEGAL person AKA Trust in your name. I just can't find the documents that support that as a legal structure. (Nor how it ties to the SSA or Birth certificates, etc.).

I have been trying to verify most of this, and have gotten not very far until I get to The Fed and the IRS (and other Banks). There I have a ton of solid evidence of rather unbelievable fuckery (beyond that which is commonly stated in even the most damning reports). That's gonna be a big fat red-pill once I get that part of the report out.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Shortly thereafter, the private corporations known as "the United States of America (Inc) {Crown} and "UNITED STATES (Inc) {Vatican - municipal}

Do you have evidence that supports this? I can't find this anywhere, and I have looked. I could not find evidence in the Organic Act of 1871 that supports this. All that seems to do is create a municipal corp for D.C., which is owned(?) by the United States Government. I'm not sure if the United States government that owns D.C. is the same government that was incorporated by the Constitution (it incorporated the sovereign entity (governing body) we call the U.S. of A) or if it is some other United States government created after (for which I can't find documentation). The CEO for that corp is The President, the Congress is the ruling body, etc. It seems to be an independent city state, since it is technically (legally) foreign to all states.

So it is technically a foreign corporation, but that's not as damning as it sounds because each State is a foreign corporation to every other state. D.C. is a foreign (municipal) corporation to all of them. So it is, just like the Vatican and London, an independent City State.

But linking that to the Crown, or the Vatican by any measure I just have not been able to do. I can't find any connection of ownership or allegiance in any law, or financial record, or treaty, etc. That doesn't mean it isn't there, even where I have looked. It can get confusing, and seeing the essential pieces takes intense concentration on otherwise dry documents, but I have looked quite a bit and i can't find this connection (in a real document).

If you have that evidence, or have any idea where to find it, that would be absolutely huge for my report.

D.C. could be owned through municipal bonds. I have tried to find bond ownership for D.C. bonds but I can't find any documentation. I can only find that they exist.

Actually, if you have any primary sources (or solid secondary sources with primary references) for some of the other statements you have made, that would be absolutely awesome. Specifically, the creation of the Capitalized LEGAL person AKA Trust in your name. I just can't find the documents that support that as a legal structure. (Nor how it ties to the SSA or Birth certificates, etc.).

I have been trying to verify most of this, and have gotten not very far until I get to The Fed and the IRS (and other Banks). There I have a ton of solid evidence of rather unbelievable fuckery (beyond that which is commonly stated in even the most damning reports). That's gonna be a big fat red-pill once I get that part of the report out.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Shortly thereafter, the private corporations known as "the United States of America (Inc) {Crown} and "UNITED STATES (Inc) {Vatican - municipal}

Do you have evidence that supports this? I can't find this anywhere, and I have looked. I could not find evidence in the Organic Act of 1871 that supports this. All that seems to do is create a municipal corp for D.C., which is owned(?) by the United States Government. I'm not sure if the United States government that owns D.C. is the same government that was incorporated by the Constitution (it incorporated the sovereign entity we call the U.S. of A) or if it is some other United States government created after (for which I can't find documentation). The CEO for that corp is The President, the Congress is the ruling body, etc. It seems to be an independent city state, since it is technically (legally) foreign to all states.

So it is technically a foreign corporation, but that's not as damning as it sounds because each State is a foreign corporation to every other state. D.C. is a foreign (municipal) corporation to all of them. So it is, just like the Vatican and London, an independent City State.

But linking that to the Crown, or the Vatican by any measure I just have not been able to do. I can't find any connection of ownership or allegiance in any law, or financial record, or treaty, etc. That doesn't mean it isn't there, even where I have looked. It can get confusing, and seeing the essential pieces takes intense concentration on otherwise dry documents, but I have looked quite a bit and i can't find this connection (in a real document).

If you have that evidence, or have any idea where to find it, that would be absolutely huge for my report.

D.C. could be owned through municipal bonds. I have tried to find bond ownership for D.C. bonds but I can't find any documentation. I can only find that they exist.

Actually, if you have any primary sources (or solid secondary sources with primary references) for some of the other statements you have made, that would be absolutely awesome. Specifically, the creation of the Capitalized LEGAL person AKA Trust in your name. I just can't find the documents that support that as a legal structure. (Nor how it ties to the SSA or Birth certificates, etc.).

I have been trying to verify most of this, and have gotten not very far until I get to The Fed and the IRS (and other Banks). There I have a ton of solid evidence of rather unbelievable fuckery (beyond that which is commonly stated in even the most damning reports). That's gonna be a big fat red-pill once I get that part of the report out.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Shortly thereafter, the private corporations known as "the United States of America (Inc) {Crown} and "UNITED STATES (Inc) {Vatican - municipal}

Do you have evidence that supports this? I can't find this anywhere, and I have looked. I could not find evidence in the Organic Act of 1871 that supports this. All that seems to do is create a municipal corp for D.C., which is owned(?) by the United States Government. I'm not sure if the United States government that owns D.C. is the same government that was incorporated by the Constitution (it created the sovereign entity we call the U.S. of A) or if it is some other United States government created after (for which I can't find documentation). The CEO for that corp is The President, the Congress is the ruling body, etc. It seems to be an independent city state, since it is technically (legally) foreign to all states.

So it is technically a foreign corporation, but that's not as damning as it sounds because each State is a foreign corporation to every other state. D.C. is a foreign (municipal) corporation to all of them. So it is, just like the Vatican and London, an independent City State.

But linking that to the Crown, or the Vatican by any measure I just have not been able to do. I can't find any connection of ownership or allegiance in any law, or financial record, or treaty, etc. That doesn't mean it isn't there, even where I have looked. It can get confusing, and seeing the essential pieces takes intense concentration on otherwise dry documents, but I have looked quite a bit and i can't find this connection (in a real document).

If you have that evidence, or have any idea where to find it, that would be absolutely huge for my report.

D.C. could be owned through municipal bonds. I have tried to find bond ownership for D.C. bonds but I can't find any documentation. I can only find that they exist.

Actually, if you have any primary sources (or solid secondary sources with primary references) for some of the other statements you have made, that would be absolutely awesome. Specifically, the creation of the Capitalized LEGAL person AKA Trust in your name. I just can't find the documents that support that as a legal structure. (Nor how it ties to the SSA or Birth certificates, etc.).

I have been trying to verify most of this, and have gotten not very far until I get to The Fed and the IRS (and other Banks). There I have a ton of solid evidence of rather unbelievable fuckery (beyond that which is commonly stated in even the most damning reports). That's gonna be a big fat red-pill once I get that part of the report out.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Shortly thereafter, the private corporations known as "the United States of America (Inc) {Crown} and "UNITED STATES (Inc) {Vatican - municipal}

Do you have evidence that supports this? I can't find this anywhere, and I have looked. I could not find evidence in the Organic Act of 1871 that supports this. All that seems to do is create a municipal corp for D.C., which is owned(?) by the United States Government. I'm not sure if the United States government that owns D.C. is the same government that was incorporated by the Constitution (it created the sovereign entity we call the U.S. of A) or if it is some other United States government created after (for which I can't find documentation). The CEO for that corp is The President, the Congress is the ruling body, etc. It seems to be an independent city state, since it is technically (legally) foreign to all states.

So it is technically a foreign corporation, but that's not as damning as it sounds because each State is a foreign corporation to every other state. D.C. is a foreign (municipal) corporation to all of them. So it is, just like the Vatican and London, an independent City State.

But linking that to the Crown, or the Vatican by any measure I just have not been able to do. I can't find any connection of ownership or allegiance in any law, or financial record, or treaty, etc. That doesn't mean it isn't there, even where I have looked. It can get confusing, and seeing the essential pieces takes intense concentration on otherwise dry documents, but I have looked quite a bit and i can't find this connection (in a real document).

If you have that evidence, or have any idea where to find it, that would be absolutely huge for my report.

Actually, if you have any primary sources (or solid secondary sources with primary references) for some of the other statements you have made, that would be absolutely awesome. Specifically, the creation of the Capitalized LEGAL person AKA Trust in your name. I just can't find the documents that support that as a legal structure. (Nor how it ties to the SSA or Birth certificates, etc.).

I have been trying to verify most of this, and have gotten not very far until I get to The Fed and the IRS (and other Banks). There I have a ton of solid evidence of rather unbelievable fuckery (beyond that which is commonly stated in even the most damning reports). That's gonna be a big fat red-pill once I get that part of the report out.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Shortly thereafter, the private corporations known as "the United States of America (Inc) {Crown} and "UNITED STATES (Inc) {Vatican - municipal}

Do you have evidence that supports this? I can't find this anywhere, and I have looked. I could not find evidence in the Organic Act of 1871 that supports this. All that seems to do is create a municipal corp for D.C., which is owned by the United States Government. I'm not sure if the United States government that owns D.C. is the same government that was incorporated by the Constitution (it created the sovereign entity we call the U.S. of A) or if it is some other United States government created after (for which I can't find documentation). The CEO for that corp is The President, the Congress is the ruling body, etc. It seems to be an independent city state, since it is technically (legally) foreign to all states.

So it is technically a foreign corporation, but that's not as damning as it sounds because each State is a foreign corporation to every other state. D.C. is a foreign (municipal) corporation to all of them. So it is, just like the Vatican and London, an independent City State.

But linking that to the Crown, or the Vatican by any measure I just have not been able to do. I can't find any connection of ownership or allegiance in any law, or financial record, or treaty, etc. That doesn't mean it isn't there, even where I have looked. It can get confusing, and seeing the essential pieces takes intense concentration on otherwise dry documents, but I have looked quite a bit and i can't find this connection (in a real document).

If you have that evidence, or have any idea where to find it, that would be absolutely huge for my report.

Actually, if you have any primary sources (or solid secondary sources with primary references) for some of the other statements you have made, that would be absolutely awesome. Specifically, the creation of the Capitalized LEGAL person AKA Trust in your name. I just can't find the documents that support that as a legal structure. (Nor how it ties to the SSA or Birth certificates, etc.).

I have been trying to verify most of this, and have gotten not very far until I get to The Fed and the IRS (and other Banks). There I have a ton of solid evidence of rather unbelievable fuckery (beyond that which is commonly stated in even the most damning reports). That's gonna be a big fat red-pill once I get that part of the report out.

2 years ago
1 score