I have seen no evidence that supports the idea that the process of our cells creating the spike protein continues indefinitely. The mRNA in the vaccines has a half life of a couple days (several times longer than endogenous mRNA which is on average 10 hours). This means that according to that reported half life, the mRNA will continue to create the spike protein within our cells for a couple weeks. The evidence that I have seen supports that time frame.

This says nothing about long term effects (damage) caused by vaccines, but these are different problems than the cells creating the SARS S-protein that can cause the damage.

So there are two problems (more than two, but for this elaboration two is sufficient):

1. our cells produce spike proteins for a couple weeks (3 max probably)
2. damage is caused by our cells producing spike proteins for a couple weeks.

This DAMAGE can then cause serious problems down the road, like inflammation, or ADE, or heart attacks, or cancer, or organ failure, or many other issues that come primarily from a deficient immune system (caused by the cells expressing the Spike protein for a couple weeks).

So the article is less bullshit in what it says, than in what it doesn't say. That can be said for just about anything including things that would fall into the "anti-vax" category. Everyone subtracts from the larger picture to present their point. It's just what people generally do. Rarely will you see someone try to present things in their full context.

I have seen no evidence that supports the idea that the process of our cells creating the spike protein continues indefinitely. The mRNA in the vaccines has a half life of a couple days (several times longer than endogenous mRNA which is on average 10 hours). This means that according to that reported half life, the mRNA will continue to create the spike protein within our cells for a couple weeks. The evidence that I have seen supports that time frame.

This says nothing about long term effects (damage) caused by vaccines, but these are different problems than the cells creating the SARS S-protein that can cause the damage.

So there are two problems (more than two, but for this elaboration two is sufficient):

1. our cells produce spike proteins for a couple weeks (3 max probably)
2. damage is caused by our cells producing spike proteins for a couple weeks.

This DAMAGE can then cause serious problems down the road, like inflammation, or ADE, or heart attacks, or cancer, or organ failure, or many other issues that come from primarily from a deficient immune system (caused by the cells expressing the Spike protein for a couple weeks).

So the article is less bullshit in what it says, than in what it doesn't say. That can be said for just about anything including things that would fall into the "anti-vax" category. Everyone subtracts from the larger picture to present their point. It's just what people generally do. Rarely will you see someone try to present things in their full context.