This is the last two pages of the order from the Louisiana injunction ruling today. It was filed by 14 state attorney generals but the judge ruled the injunction for the country bc “there are unvaccinated healthcare workers in ther states that need protection”. I spent some time rifling through the docs and figured I would give a synopsis of the ruling. )Many of us are informed but never hurts). The threat was that the Medicaid provider agreements would be terminated if the employees and contractors were not jabbed. The big question is does the defendant have the authority. One thing interesting is that they are claiming 2.4 million aren’t jabbed. I would estimate the number higher. From 4/6/20 to 6/21/21 CMS (center for Medicaid services) issues 6 rules/regulations that were to be with the appropriate timeline for adjustments for issues like disinfecting, data reporting, and distancing. However, on 9/9 Biden said he wouldn’t force the vax and then 11/5 said it was to be mandated. The CMS issued the mandate effective immediately, which goes against the reporting timeframe policies they have in place. This was a thorn in the judges side. They had two months to send a directive as they did the six previous times. It’s federal overreach. And IMO, this is NOT a mistake a govt agency makes so blatantly. Preemptive of local and state law. Remember the cruise ships in FL? The ruling was the state has a right to protect its proprietary interest. In this case, the states have a sovereign interest in protecting its citizens. The judge ruled that the mandate overexclusive because it didn’t take into account extenuating circumstances and it was under inclusive as only businesses who have more than 99 employees had to comply. The judge said, it shows the true purpose is not to ensure workplace safety, but to ramp up vaccine intake. THIS RULING IS HUGE! It encompasses the separation of power. It’s aligning with the other 10 AG’s that filed in Missouri. That’s 24 AG’s. The other day we discussed that no AG’s had signed Lindell’s filing. We have to educate the masses to the separation of branches. People are dumb. This is how it begins, so patience frens… we’re getting there!

Edit: Sorry for typos, I’ll fix tomorrow! Stayed up too late “working” and have to work in a few hours!

This is the last two pages of the order from the Louisiana injunction ruling today. It was filed by 14 state attorney generals but the judge ruled the injunction for the country bc “there are unvaccinated healthcare workers in ther states that need protection”. I spent some time rifling through the docs and figured I would give a synopsis of the ruling. )Many of us are informed but never hurts). The threat was that the Medicaid provider agreements would be terminated if the employees and contractors were not jabbed. The big question is does the defendant have the authority. One thing interesting is that they are claiming 2.4 million aren’t jabbed. I would estimate the number higher. From 4/6/20 to 6/21/21 CMS (center for Medicaid services) issues 6 rules/regulations that were to be with the appropriate timeline for adjustments for issues like disinfecting, data reporting, and distancing. However, on 9/9 Biden said he wouldn’t force the vax and then 11/5 said it was to be mandated. The CMS issued the mandate effective immediately, which goes against the reporting timeframe policies they have in place. This was a thorn in the judges side. They had two months to send a directive as they did the six previous times. It’s federal overreach. And IMO, this is NOT a mistake a govt agency makes so blatantly. Preemptive of local and state law. Remember the cruise ships in FL? The ruling was the state has a right to protect its proprietary interest. In this case, the states have a sovereign interest in protecting its citizens. The judge ruled that the mandate overexclusive because it didn’t take into account extenuating circumstances and it was under inclusive as only businesses who have more than 99 employees had to comply. The judge said, it shows the true purpose is not to ensure workplace safety, but to ramp up vaccine intake. THIS RULING IS HUGE! It encompasses the separation of power. It’s aligning with the other 10 AG’s that filed in Missouri. That’s 24 AG’s. The other day we discussed that no AG’s had signed Lindell’s filing. Patience frens! We’re getting there!

Edit: Sorry for typos, I’ll fix tomorrow! Stayed up too late “working” and have to work in a few hours!

This is the last two pages of the order from the Louisiana injunction ruling today. It was filed by 14 state attorney generals but the judge ruled the injunction for the country bc “there are unvaccinated healthcare workers in ther states that need protection”. I spent some time rifling through the docs and figured I would give a synopsis of the ruling. )Many of us are informed but never hurts). The threat was that the Medicaid provider agreements would be terminated if the employees and contractors were not jabbed. The big question is does the defendant have the authority. One thing interesting is that they are claiming 2.4 million aren’t jabbed. I would estimate the number higher. From 4/6/20 to 6/21/21 CMS (center for Medicaid services) issues 6 rules/regulations that were to be with the appropriate timeline for adjustments for issues like disinfecting, data reporting, and distancing. However, on 9/9 Biden said he wouldn’t force the vax and then 11/5 said it was to be mandated. The CMS issued the mandate effective immediately, which goes against the reporting timeframe policies they have in place. This was a thorn in the judges side. They had two months to send a directive as they did the six previous times. It’s federal overreach. Preemptive of local and state law. Remember the cruise ships in FL? The ruling was the state has a right to protect its proprietary interest. In this case, the states have a sovereign interest in protecting its citizens. The judge ruled that the mandate exclusive because it didn’t take into account extenuating circumstances and it was inder inclusive as only businesses who have more than 99 employees had to comply. The judge said, it shows the true purpose is not to ensure workplace safety, but to ramp up vaccine intake. THIS RULING IS HUGE! It encompasses the separation of power. It’s aligning with the other 10 AG’s that filed in Missouri. That’s 24 AG’s. The other day we discussed that no AG’s had signed Lindell’s filing. Patience frens! We’re getting there!

Edit: Sorry for typos, I’ll fix tomorrow! Stayed up too late “working” and have to work in a few hours!

This is the last two pages of the order from the Louisiana injunction ruling today. It was filed by 14 state attorney generals but the judge ruled the injunction for the country bc “there are unvaccinated healthcare workers in ther states that need protection”. I spent some time rifling through the docs and figured I would give a synopsis of the ruling. )Many of us are informed but never hurts). The threat was that the Medicaid provider agreements would be terminated if the employees and contractors were not jabbed. The big question is does the defendant have the authority. One thing interesting is that they are claiming 2.4 million aren’t jabbed. I would estimate the number higher. From 4/6/20 to 6/21/21 CMS (center for Medicaid services) issues 6 rules/regulations that were to be with the appropriate timeline for adjustments for issues like disinfecting, data reporting, and distancing. However, on 9/9 Biden said he wouldn’t force the vax and then 11/5 said it was to be mandated. The CMS issued the mandate effective immediately, which goes against the reporting timeframe policies they have in place. This was a thorn in the judges side. They had two months to send a directive as they did the six previous times. It’s federal overreach. Preemptive of local and state law. Remember the cruise ships in FL? The ruling was the state has a right to protect its proprietary interest. In this case, the states have a sovereign interest in protecting its citizens. The judge ruled that the mandate exclusive because it didn’t take into account extenuating circumstances and it was inder inclusive as only businesses who have more than 99 employees had to comply. The judge said, it shows the true purpose is not to ensure workplace safety, but to ramp up vaccine intake. THIS RULING IS HUGE! It encompasses the separation of power. It’s aligning with the other 10 AG’s that filed in Missouri. That’s 24 AG’s. The other day we discussed that no AG’s had signed Lindell’s filing. Patience frens! We’re getting there!