Let's say we grant the sheep a bunch of their false premises, like, (1) it is the unvaxxed generating most or all of the variants, (2) it is the variants that are bypassing the jabs, and (3) that the vaccines are 90-95% effective.

Now, let's say an unvaxxed person loses their sanity/will to resist, and decides to get jabbed.

Making a few assumptions, which I've tried to quickly verify (but haven't had much luck of yet):

1. you would still need three jabs to be "protected" against the Delta scariant
2. it is the third dose, and the third dose alone, which is "highly effective" against the Delta variant, and, you cannot skip to the third dose without having the previous two jabs

What we know is that each jab requires some period of time between them. I'm not sure exactly how long this is (as I recall, they 'accelerated' it at some point), something like 4-8 weeks.

And it takes a few weeks after the last jab for the set of jabs to have altered your immune system enough for the jab to be "effective".

So, let's now say that everyone who is unvaxxed collectively loses their minds, and decides to get jabbed, ASAP. The tyrants snap their fingers, and it is magically done. A great forgetting (or forceful coercion) of sorts.

And let's say that this is an efficient process, that they can get people jabbed right away, without much delay (logistically speaking, this seems rather unlikely, to say the least).

Someone who actually believes the narrative, would call this a "best case scenario".

Even under these conditions, with no one resisting the jab and the jab roll-out going smoothly ... By the time that everyone who is unvaxxed gets their third dose, a few months would have passed prior to them being "immune" to the Delta variant.

In that time frame, tonnes of new variants could have spawned, and, circling back to their original false premise #2, a fourth jab would be needed for these new variants. We've already heard talk of a Lambda and Delta Plus variant, for instance.

As such, even in their "best case" scenario (and granting them a bunch of their false premises), the jab roll-out still fails.

You will forever be playing catch up to the new variants. The lockdowns will continue. It will never end.

This is the logical conclusion of their current arguments, even while granting their false premises.

(This argument breaks down a bit if you can get the "Delta variant" booster as your second jab instead of "needing" a third dose, but even so, there is still enough of a time gap that new variants would form).

Let's say we grant the sheep a bunch of their false premises, like, (1) it is the unvaxxed generating most or all of the variants, (2) it is the variants that are bypassing the jabs, and (3) that the vaccines are 90-95% effective.

Now, let's say an unvaxxed person loses their sanity/will to resist, and decides to get jabbed.

Making a few assumptions, which I've tried to quickly verify (but haven't had much luck of yet):

1. you would still need three jabs to be "protected" against the Delta scariant
2. it is the third dose, and the third dose alone, which is "highly effective" against the Delta variant, and, you cannot skip to the third dose without having the previous two jabs

What we know is that each jab requires some period of time between them. I'm not sure exactly how long this is (as I recall, they 'accelerated' it at some point), something like 4-8 weeks.

And it takes a few weeks after the last jab for the set of jabs to have altered your immune system enough for the jab to be "effective".

So, let's now say that everyone who is unvaxxed collectively loses their minds, and decides to get jabbed, ASAP. The tyrants snap their fingers, and it is magically done. A great forgetting (or forceful coercion) of sorts.

And let's say that this is an efficient process, that they can get people jabbed right away, without much delay (logistically speaking, this seems rather unlikely, to say the least).

Someone who actually believes the narrative, would call this a "best case scenario".

Even under these conditions, with no one resisting the jab and the jab roll-out going smoothly ... By the time that everyone who is unvaxxed gets their third dose, a few months would have passed prior to them being "immune" to the Delta variant.

In that time frame, tonnes of new variants could have spawned, and, circling back to their original false premise #2, a fourth jab would be needed for these new variants. We've already heard talk of a Lambda and Delta Plus variant, for instance.

As such, even in their "best case" scenario (and granting them a bunch of their false premises), the jab rollout still fails.

You will forever be playing catch up to the new variants. The lockdowns will continue. It will never end.

This is the logical conclusion of their current arguments, even while granting their false premises.

(This argument breaks down a bit if you can get the "Delta variant" booster as your second jab instead of "needing" a third dose, but even so, there is still enough of a time gap that new variants would form).

Let's say we grant the sheep a bunch of their false premises, like, (1) it is the unvaxxed generating most or all of the variants, (2) it is the variants that are bypassing the jabs, and (3) that the vaccines are 90-95% effective.

Now, let's say an unvaxxed person loses their sanity/will to resist, and decides to get jabbed.

Making a few assumptions, which I've tried to quickly verify (but haven't had much luck of yet):

1. you would still need three jabs to be "protected" against the Delta scariant
2. it is the third dose, and the third dose alone, which is "highly effective" against the Delta variant, and, you cannot skip to the third dose without having the previous two jabs

What we know is that each jab requires some period of time between them. I'm not sure exactly how long this is (as I recall, they 'accelerated' it at some point), something like 4-8 weeks.

And it takes a few weeks after the last jab for the set of jabs to have altered your immune system enough for the jab to be "effective".

So, let's now say that everyone who is unvaxxed collectively loses their minds, and decides to get jabbed, ASAP. The tyrants snap their fingers, and it is magically done. A great forgetting (or forceful coercion) of sorts.

And let's say that this is an efficient process, that they can get people jabbed right away, without much delay (logistically speaking, this seems rather unlikely, to say the least).

Someone who actually believes the narrative, would call this a "best case scenario".

Even under these conditions, with no one resisting the jab and the jab roll-out going smoothly ... By the time that everyone who is unvaxxed gets their third dose, a few months would have passed prior to them being "immune" to the Delta variant.

In that time frame, tonnes of new variants could have spawned, and, circling back to their original false premise #2, a fourth jab would be needed for these new variants. We've already heard talk of a Lambda and Delta Plus variant, for instance.

As such, even in their "best case" scenario (and granting them a bunch of their false premises), the jab rollout still fails. You will forever be playing catch up to the new variants. The lockdowns will continue. it will never end.

This is the logical conclusion of their current arguments, even while granting their false premises.

(This argument breaks down a bit if you can get the "Delta variant" booster as your second jab instead of "needing" a third dose, but even so, there is still enough of a time gap that new variants would form).

Let's say we grant the sheep a bunch of their false premises, like, (1) it is the unvaxxed generating most or all of the variants, (2) it is the variants that are bypassing the jabs, and (3) that the vaccines are 90-95% effective.

Now, let's say an unvaxxed person loses their sanity/will to resist, and decides to get

Making a few assumptions, which I've tried to quickly verify (but haven't had much luck of yet):

1. you would still need three jabs to be "protected" against the Delta scariant
2. it is the third dose, and the third dose alone, which is "highly effective" against the Delta variant, and, you cannot skip to the third dose without having the previous two jabs

What we know is that each jab requires some period of time between them. I'm not sure exactly how long this is (as I recall, they 'accelerated' it at some point), something like 4-8 weeks.

And it takes a few weeks after the last jab for the set of jabs to have altered your immune system enough for the jab to be "effective".

So, let's now say that everyone who is unvaxxed collectively loses their minds, and decides to get jabbed, ASAP. The tyrants snap their fingers, and it is magically done. A great forgetting (or forceful coercion) of sorts.

And let's say that this is an efficient process, that they can get people jabbed right away, without much delay (logistically speaking, this seems rather unlikely, to say the least).

Someone who actually believes the narrative, would call this a "best case scenario".

Even under these conditions, with no one resisting the jab and the jab roll-out going smoothly ... By the time that everyone who is unvaxxed gets their third dose, a few months would have passed prior to them being "immune" to the Delta variant.

In that time frame, tonnes of new variants could have spawned, and, circling back to their original false premise #2, a fourth jab would be needed for these new variants. We've already heard talk of a Lambda and Delta Plus variant, for instance.

As such, even in their "best case" scenario (and granting them a bunch of their false premises), the jab rollout still fails. You will forever be playing catch up to the new variants. The lockdowns will continue. it will never end.

This is the logical conclusion of their current arguments, even while granting their false premises.

(This argument breaks down a bit if you can get the "Delta variant" booster as your second jab instead of "needing" a third dose, but even so, there is still enough of a time gap that new variants would form).