Thanks Reckoning.

I appreciate the detailed reply.

PS.

1. Can you give some examples of what you consider "paytriot interviews"?

2. Can you please provide evidence or reports on those speaking fees, with concrete numbers?

3. I've heard about the "occult prayer". Would be curious to see it, and find out what people think is "occult".

4. A lot more details here required here. Note, I'm not asking the above in order to 'disprove' your view. Rather, I accept that you have a view and that its based on things your seen, heard and observed. I'm interested to formulate my own views, and so such details would be useful for that purpose. (also to evaluate just how credible you current conclusions are, which is not to say they aren't credible, just that I have no way to evaluate without data. Also, if it seems providing this data or responses to these question is burdensome, just know that this would not prejudice my view of your conclusions. You've already responded in details and I appreciate that.)

5. The recording of Flynn saying Q is a psyop. I listened to that in detail, and in fact posted a verbatim transcription of it to GAW. I find other explanations for that conversation quite plausible, but let me ask you this: If Flynn WAS a double agent or untrustworthy, WHY would he respond to Woods in that way? For what benefit?

6. Alex Jones. Given that we are involved in an information war, a covert war, in which intel is key, I don't see Flynn using Jones as an outlet to be problematic. For others I would be far less inclined to attribute deeper motives to, it would be. Again, the question is, if Flynn is a double agent or untrustworthy, WHY ON EARTH would he be going on Alex Jones? (Surely Flynn knows exactly what anons think of Jones, and why.) what purpose/benefit, for a double agent? A double agent has to look impeccable to the ones he is attempting to swindle.

7. yes, the bands, the wwg1, etc. My current view: smoke and mirrors, smoke and mirrors.

8. Re: brother. Well, if devolution is real, and Patel P is accurate, the simportant power rests in the hands of the theatre commanders, such as Flynns brother. But yeah, if the flynns were rotten, then that would also be a plausible explanation.

9. Comments off? I have no issue with that.

10. "apparently trying to run for President in 2024" is this just rumor? on what is the "apparently" based? I'm curious.

I do like the way that you have been able to enumerate the multiple reasons which all contribute, no doubt, to your current conclusions.

Just to share: my own gut feeling is that IF Flynn were Q operation, then ALL of the above could very reasonably be understood and explained. I mean, if Flynn were Q operation, then my goodness, he is REALLY in the central eye of the storm.

Look at what Potus does. How he behaves. He definitely performs, and by his performance, manipulates and shapes the public perceptions, and the responses and reactions of the opponents - the Media, the Dems, etc.

If Flynn were Q operations, he also would very, very likely be playing a "role" to manipulate perceptions, etc.

So far, my gut goes with trusting flynn. For a bunch of reasons. Hopefully not to be proven wrong!

Thanks anon. Replies of substance may the interactions worthwhile.

Thanks Reckoning.

I appreciate the detailed reply.