Decent. I agree 1) that this is the most plausible, especially since he keeps advocating for choices, unlike the pro-vaxx mandate goverenors, who are now doing to the children in their states what they did to the elderly, and 2) the lock downs would most certainly have continued without a vaxx for at least one or two more years, maybe longer. So I'd go for 3 and 5 until I have evidence of more options or combinations being possible. What's causing steam to exit my ears is the whole 'vaxx for children' demon-inspired anti-science scheme!
-
Children neither get severe cases of Wuhan Flu, nor are they likely to spread it.
-
They are the most vulnerable to vaxx side effects, since they are still building their immune systems (BTW, the same applied to the ill-effects of both lockdowns and masking.)
Decent. I agree 1) that this is the most plausible, especially since he keeps advocating for choices, unlike the pro-vaxx mandate goverenors, who are now doing to the children in their states what they did to the elderly, and 2) the lock downs would most certainly have continued without a vaxx for at least one or two more years, maybe longer. What's causing steam to exit my ears is the whole 'vaxx for children' demon-inspired anti-science scheme!
-
Children neither get severe cases of Wuhan Flu, nor are they likely to spread it.
-
They are the most vulnerable to vaxx side effects, since they are still building their immune systems (BTW, the same applied to the ill-effects of both lockdowns and masking.)