Whether or not one chooses to believe in God or to be good or evil is only a couple of scenarios. What if, for example, someone prays every single day that their family will wake up to the MSM propaganda? How is it possible for God to answer such a prayer without impeding on someone's free will?

Whether it's placing thoughts inside their head to make them think about MSM differently, or by controlling the world around them to make them be in the right place at the right time (while also simultaneously controlling the people who end up presenting that information to have them do it at the right time) to see certain information that changes their view.

In fact, thinking about it now, the entire idea of praying for other people (in terms of situations like the one I presented above as opposed to praying for someone else to recover from an injury which wouldn't violate free will in any way) seems pointless as any action taken by God to answer any of those prayers would violate the free will of someone.

Then there are situations where people attribute some kind of happening to God. How could He control certain outcomes without stamping on people's free will by making them do certain things to achieve that outcome?

Kyle Rittenhouse surviving the attack is one thing that I've seen many people say is divine intervention. How would this work? Controlling Kyle to make him survive the encounter? Controlling his attackers to prevent them from succeeding in their goal?

The "Armor of God". How can God protect anybody from anybody else without controlling people or impeding on free will somewhere along the line?

Yes, there are plenty of examples of things God can do that don't impede on free will but there's also plenty of things that do. And from what I've seen people seem to make no distinction between the two.

Whether or not one chooses to believe in God or to be good or evil is only a couple of scenarios. What if, for example, someone prays every single day that their family will wake up to the MSM propaganda? How is it possible for God to answer such a prayer without impeding on someone's free will?

Whether it's placing thoughts inside their head to make them think about MSM differently, or by controlling the world around them to make them be in the right place at the right time (while also simultaneously controlling the people who end up presenting that information to have them do it at the right time) to see certain information that changes their view.

In fact, thinking about it now, the entire idea of praying for other people (in terms of situations like the one I presented above as opposed to praying for someone else to recover from an injury which wouldn't violate free will in any way) seems pointless as any action taken by God to answer any of those prayers would violate the free will of someone.

Then there are situations where people attribute some kind of happening to God. How could He control certain outcomes without stamping on people's free will by making them do certain things to achieve that outcome?

Kyle Rittenhouse surviving the attack is one thing that I've seen many people say is divine intervention. How would this work? Controlling Kyle to make him survive the encounter? Controlling his attackers to prevent them from succeeding in their goal?

The armor of God. How can God protect anybody from anybody else without controlling people or impeding on free will somewhere along the line?

Yes, there are plenty of examples of things God can do that don't impede on free will but there's also plenty of things that do. And from what I've seen people seem to make no distinction between the two.